“It’s a work in progress” – Lotto urge patience after Arnaud De Lie fades early at Kuurne - Bruxelles - Kuurne
Cycling
Arnaud De Lie’s name was missing from the decisive phase of Kuurne - Bruxelles - Kuurne, and for a rider billed as one of the major sprint threats of Opening Weekend, that absence raised eyebrows.
Inside the Lotto-Intermarche camp, however, there is no sense of alarm. “It’s a work in progress,” sports director Aike Visbeek said afterwards in quotes collected by HLN. “We knew that before we started the spring.”
De Lie was distanced in the hill zone, despite arriving at the start with confidence.
“He felt super before the race,” Visbeek explained. “In the team meeting, the plan was to push hard in the hills so it would become a sprint for riders like Brennan and Arnaud. In the end, he cracked there. We had Steffen De Schuyteneer as a second option, and we played that card afterwards.”
Managing expectations after a race against time
The fade came on a day shaped by pressure in the hills and crosswinds that repeatedly split the field. For Lotto, the script had been clear: increase the pace in the decisive terrain to reduce the sprint field and give De Lie a manageable finale.
Instead, the Belgian was among those who slipped out of contention as the race intensified.
Visbeek suggested the explanation may lie as much in Saturday at Omloop Het Nieuwsblad as Sunday. “This could be a reaction from yesterday. He went deep then. It’s also a matter of race hardness that he’s still missing at the moment.”
That race hardness is central to the broader picture. De Lie spent the off-season working his way back from an ankle injury, and his build-up to the spring was described internally as tight.
“It was a race against time to get him ready, and that seems to have worked,” Visbeek said. “We’re not worried. You also have to look at the full picture. We have a strong team, Arnaud is focused and motivated. We rode a solid Opening Weekend, but in the end we’re left empty-handed.”
Building towards Tirreno
Rather than viewing Kuurne as a setback, Lotto see it as part of a progression. “De Lie definitely still needs next weekend to continue building towards Tirreno-Adriatico,” Visbeek added.
For now, the emphasis remains on development rather than immediate results. Kuurne may not have delivered the sprint opportunity Lotto envisaged, but internally the focus is on conditioning, continuity and patience.
If this spring is indeed a work in progress, Lotto are determined not to judge it too early.
Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment