INEOS set to totally disappear from the peloton? British WorldTour team confirm “we’re going back to market” after Netcompany investment
Cycling
One of the most recognisable names in modern cycling could be set to disappear from the peloton altogether after senior figures within the newly rebranded Netcompany INEOS Cycling Team confirmed they are already searching for another major title sponsor.
The British WorldTour squad only debuted their new green and grey colours at the Giro d’Italia this week following the arrival of Danish software and AI company Netcompany, but the latest comments from the team suggest the rebrand may not be the final stage of the project’s transformation.
Speaking to the Leaders Worth Knowing podcast, the team’s Chief Commercial Officer Tom Hill revealed that the squad is already looking for an additional co-title partner beyond Netcompany. “We have Netcompany as our first name-co title partner, but we're going back to market looking for a second co-title partner,” Hill explained.
That immediately raises the prospect of the INEOS name eventually disappearing entirely from the team title despite owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe remaining involved behind the scenes. When discussing the possibility of a future naming structure, Hill referenced the idea of “Netcompany-X”, with the “X” representing another incoming sponsor. For cycling fans, it would mark another major identity shift for one of the sport’s defining teams of the modern era.
Read also
From Team Sky dominance to another rebrand
The squad first entered the WorldTour in 2010 as Team Sky, built around the ambition of delivering a British Tour de France winner. Within two years, Bradley Wiggins achieved exactly that before Chris Froome turned the team into cycling’s dominant Grand Tour force.
Between 2012 and 2019, the organisation won seven Tours de France through Wiggins, Froome, Geraint Thomas and Egan Bernal. Marginal gains, control riding and overwhelming financial strength became synonymous with the Sky project during one of the most successful periods any team has enjoyed in the modern sport. The transition to Team INEOS came in 2019 following the end of Sky’s sponsorship agreement, before the team became INEOS Grenadiers a year later.
Now, however, another evolution appears to be underway. While Hill stressed that Ratcliffe’s company remains committed to the project long term, the comments also reflected the growing financial arms race at the top of men’s cycling.
“Ineos will absolutely remain involved as a long-term backer, with a massive interest in cycling. That has never waned,” Hill said. “Sir Jim has a very passionate interest in cycling and has been a very fantastic supporter and backer.”
The modern WorldTour superteam battle
The wider backdrop is a rapidly changing WorldTour landscape. Over recent seasons, UAE Team Emirates - XRG and Team Visma | Lease a Bike have become the sport’s dominant Grand Tour teams around Tadej Pogacar and Jonas Vingegaard respectively, while the likes of Red Bull - BORA - hansgrohe, Lidl-Trek and Decathlon CMA CGM Team have also significantly increased investment.
INEOS, by contrast, have spent recent years trying to rediscover the dominance they once enjoyed during the Team Sky era.
The team have still collected major wins through riders such as Filippo Ganna, Carlos Rodriguez and Egan Bernal, but they have not won a Grand Tour since Bernal’s Giro d’Italia triumph in 2021.
Why the search for another sponsor matters
Hill openly linked additional sponsorship to the team’s long-term sporting ambitions. “Ultimately, if we can broaden the financial base by having other partners in to help put investment into the team, create that virtuous circle of more investment, better riders, win more races, more sponsors. That is the next step for us, as of now.”
For a team once defined by stability and complete control at the top of the sport, the next chapter may now depend on how successfully it can reinvent both its identity and its financial model in cycling’s rapidly escalating superteam era.
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 6visitors 5
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- You can clearly see the the posture change from slightly sitting to again out of the saddle while changing of gears in the video of the sprintabstractengineer08-11-2026
- He has already beaten Pogi twice in the TDF. the achievement is over. He cannot beat Pogi now and he only has a few years left at the top. Win Giro and compete in the TDF, maximise palmares.abstractengineer08-11-2026
- Just looked again at the photo. Yeah I stand by that. If MS had fallen over in Brands direction I don’t even think she would have hit her. You must be a UCI race commissioner. I’ll be sure to check my sock height should I ever see you on a ride. Looks like everyone else on here sees what I see.mij08-11-2026
- I said looking at the photo it doesn’t appear she deviated. Chill out, not stating my word is the final judgement. Just commenting that based on the photo I don’t see it. And BTW the Dutch coach even said she didn’t impede her.mij08-11-2026
- Blah Blah Blah !frieders308-11-2026
- MS said she was changing gears so that caused her slight deviation. Nothing was intentional.frieders308-11-2026
- How can you use a photo post incident to judge the incident itself (which is not hard to find if you’re prepared to invest the same amount of time in searching as writing that comment? It’s harsh but technically right even though this or worse is not always sanctioned in every race. The two things that went against MS (who unfortunately for her would still have won without making her mistake) are that it was not a bunch sprint where there could have been an overlooked incident or mitigating circumstances explaining a deviation. Everything was focused on just those 2, Schreiber was riding beautifully balanced which made her sudden deviation look unnatural stroke as if it could have been in some part intentional whilst she was slowly drifting ever closer towards the barrier to a point that would have reached obstruction level. In her defence, it might have been the realisation she was heading towards that that made her react suddenly and caused the deviation involuntarily. In any case, congratulations to her for the ride of her life, in people’s minds she will be credited for it.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- Good boy Obviously doesn’t need that much help dealing with pressure, as some have suggested. Wiser (and humbler) than many far further along their careers. About offering him the moon, recently someone came up with an explanation of the downfall of a football great (either referring to Maradona or Portuguese Ronaldo) saying it was kind of normal after coming back from the moon, except that others, including some who actually did go to the moon like Armstrong (Neil in case anyone is too switched off to realise) didn’t go through any of the same motions after coming back. A lot of how you deal with situations has less to do with the situation than with your character.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- I think that they're not really used to dealing with this type of incident in a cyclocross race, and the situation has been magnified because it was a race for a championship title. It's very unfortunate that the race had to be decided in this way.
santiagobenites07-11-2026 - Seriously why do they keep doing stupid things like this. Its one thing to relegate when the placings are minor, when the action is blatant. But when it is ambiguous, why dont they at least take advice from some higher up to avoid embarrassing themselves. This is similar to the Halland goal when his teammate was clearly offside and interfered in play and VAR gave them the goal. if you dont have evidence you cannot convict. Even for doping they have these rulesabstractengineer07-11-2026
Loading
3 Comments







