"He's not going to lay down and let his belly get tickled" - Geraint Thomas won't settle for podium at Giro d'Italia according to Luke Rowe
Cycling
After his second-place finish last year at the Giro d'Italia, the second spot on the podium looks realistically like the best Geraint Thomas can hope for again in 2024. According to podcast partner, teammate and great friend Luke Rowe however, the INEOS Grenadiers leader won't give up without a fight.
Sitting third overall ahead of stage 11, 2:58 down on runaway leader, Tadej Pogacar, Thomas is just 18 seconds behind Daniel Martinez. According to Rowe however, the Maglia Rosa isn't yet guaranteed to finish on Pogacar's shoulders. "You can only look at previous Grand Tours. Has he had some bad days? Yes, he has," Rowe tells Eurosport. "At the end of the day, he's got two legs and two arms like everyone else in the peloton. And talking from an INEOS standpoint, you've just got to keep believing, keep chipping away at it."
Although Thomas has been solid without being spectacular so far, Rowe believes it's his compatriot's consistency that will benefit him most by the time the race reaches Rome. "Geraint is very consistent over 21 days. I think his worst day of this Grand Tour was the time trial and he finished 10th," the Welshman explains. "He needs to stay consistent. I don't think he has to do anything over the top, go for a Hail Mary… [although] I think he might do at one point. He's not a guy who is going to settle for second. He's won the Tour de France, so if at the end of his career he also has [another] second place [in the Giro] it's not going to change a lot."
"Geraint Thomas is still trying to win the Giro," Rowe concludes firmly but optimistically about his friend's chances of Maglia Rosa glory. "He's not going to lay down and let his belly get tickled, he's there to win the bike race."
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- The main SPOTY award is "decided" by public vote but the BBC "expert panel" decide who you can choose from, that choice has an equal split of genders and is focussed on the sports BBC show and a disabled athlete. Oh yea the ubiquitous "Pub Games" candidate there too, Darts and Snooker are not sports. The other awards are decided by the "Expert Panel" again it's about the sports BBC show, cycling has had it. Cav got his for his years and achievements in the sport, not just that 35th TDF win. Unless the BBC get access to Pro Cycling it will never feature "adequately" on SPOTYslappers6621-12-2024
- Ahhh..... you have to understand the "strange" diversity concepts of the BBCslappers6621-12-2024
- Avoiding him is a good strategy, you get more wins and then you can compete in the TDF relatively relaxed. Pit yourself against Pogi and not only there will be no wins, it will be considerable mental setbackabstractengineer21-12-2024
- If you hold onto then, you blowup in a minute and then you finish 5 minutes down like Ben O'Connorabstractengineer21-12-2024
- Based on what argument?Mistermaumau21-12-2024
- Agreed except the length of climbs, pretty sure you can stretch that to about a km unless we’re talking about half a dozen in quick succession.Mistermaumau21-12-2024
- Lot of contradictory information floating around world cup contenders, someone should do some tidying up.Mistermaumau21-12-2024
- A bit much to suggest that Pogacar is better than MvdP on most terrains. The only terrain Pogacar is clearly better is long climbs, on any other terrain they are pretty even except flat cobbles and short and steep climbs (max a few 100 mtrs) where MvdP is clearly better than Pogacar.Velovibes21-12-2024
- The likelihood of RE improving enough at this point to outclass TP or JV is less than zero.verve82521-12-2024
- That’s the most stupid thing I’ve read for a long time, did you not go to school and learn even the most basic physics? Aero depends on one thing only, drag, drag depends speed and the relationship is squared and apart from maybe at zero or the speed of sound or due to side winds that relationship is valid at all speeds, it dies not “suddenly” start at a magic number. Very simply, the faster you go the more the effect becomes important. If you think 25km/h is needed to have noticeable effects you’re delusional, athletic WR are cancelled as soon as winds top 2m/s that’s 7.2km/h, why because the assistance is already too important at that speed and the times prove it. You don’t even consider wind which can significantly increase the effective speed for aerodynamics and you underestimate speed of climbs, 6% is ridden more at 30 than 25km/h, a speed at which early generation high rims were considered to have more advantages than disadvantages. And finally, as in normal races you can’t just switch bikes according to terrain, it’s pretty pointless to discuss climbs as a separate situation, the aero will have justified itself plenty during the rest of the ride.Mistermaumau21-12-2024