
The relationship between Tom Pidcock and INEOS Grenadiers
has been one of the most intriguing in professional cycling. Pidcock, one of
the sport’s brightest talents and a double Olympic Mountain Bike champion, is
under contract with the team for several more seasons. However, there are clear
signs that the relationship is strained, and with whispers of a transfer coming
from the peloton, some believe it is time for Pidcock to consider moving on.
While he has demonstrated exceptional talent, particularly
off-road, his performances on the road, particularly in stage races, have been
below the high expectations many had for him after his 2022 Tour de France
exploits.
Is Pidcock underperforming on the road?
Tom Pidcock is a generational talent, undeniably one of the
most versatile riders in professional cycling today. His achievements off the
road are impressive: double Olympic Mountain Bike champion, World Cyclocross
champion in 2022, and World Cross-Country Mountain Bike champion in 2023.
However, his results on the road, particularly in Grand Tours, tell a different
story.
Read also
Since turning professional, Pidcock has secured some major
victories, including a stage win at the Tour de France in 2022, where his
descent of the Col du Galibier and subsequent victory on Alpe d'Huez became
legendary. He also won the Amstel Gold Race in 2024 and Strade Bianche in 2023,
proving his one-day racing credentials.
However, for a rider touted as a potential Grand Tour
contender, his results in stage races have not lived up to the hype. His
highest overall finish in the Tour de France remains 13th, achieved in 2023. He
failed to finish this year’s edition due to COVID-19, and Carlos Rodriguez, a
younger rider on the same team, has surpassed him as INEOS’ main general
classification hope. Despite his obvious talent, Pidcock has not yet developed
into the GC contender that some expected after his 2022 exploits, leading to
questions about his development within the team.
Read also
INEOS Grenadiers’ struggles
INEOS Grenadiers, formerly known as Team Sky, has been one
of the most successful teams in the history of professional cycling. Dominating
the sport during the 2010s, they won multiple Tour de France titles with riders
like Chris Froome, Bradley Wiggins, Geraint Thomas, and Egan Bernal. However,
the team has faced a difficult period in recent years, culminating in a
disappointing 2024 season.
Their performance in this year’s Tour de France was a low
point, with Carlos Rodriguez’s 7th place finish being the only highlight. The
team failed to win any stages and struggled to make an impact in the mountains,
where they once reigned supreme. This drop in form has raised questions about
the team’s future direction. Sir Jim Ratcliffe, the team’s owner, has
reportedly shifted his focus to football, particularly Manchester United, which
has sparked speculation that cycling is no longer a top priority for the INEOS
group.

INEOS are a far cry from their glory days during the 2010s
This uncertainty at the management level may be impacting
the riders, including Pidcock. Once seen as a key figure in INEOS’ future, he
now finds himself in a team that has lost its competitive edge at the highest
level of stage racing.
Could Pidcock thrive elsewhere?
Given INEOS’ struggles and the reported tensions between
Pidcock and the team, it’s not surprising that other teams are showing
interest. Last week, Gazzetta dello Sport's Ciro Scognamiglio and Daniel Friebe
reported significant interest from the Swiss ProTeam Q36.5 Pro Cycling Team.
This team, while not as prestigious as INEOS, is ambitious and looking to build
a competitive roster. Rumours suggest that Q36.5’s owner, who recently bought
the Pinarello bike brand which sponsors INEOS, is keen to sign Pidcock. The
team is also backed by Red Bull, one of Pidcock’s personal sponsors, which adds
to the incentive for the man from Leeds to depart INEOS.
Read also
If Pidcock were to join Q36.5, it would be a seismic shift.
Moving from one of the most successful teams in the World Tour to a relatively
new ProTeam would be a bold decision, but it could also offer him the chance to
become the team’s undisputed leader. This change of environment might allow him
to focus on the aspects of racing where he truly excels, particularly one-day
races and stage wins, rather than the GC focus that has eluded him so far at
INEOS.
Should Pidcock focus on one-day races?
While Pidcock has undeniable talent, particularly on
technical descents and punchy climbs, his future as a Grand Tour contender is
less certain. The current era of cycling is arguably one of the most
competitive in history, with riders like Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Remco
Evenepoel, and Primoz Roglic dominating the GC landscape. These riders are not
only exceptional climbers but also time trial specialists, making it incredibly
difficult for someone like Pidcock, whose skill set leans more towards
explosiveness and technical skill, to compete consistently across three weeks.
Read also
Perhaps the answer for Pidcock is to shift his focus towards
one-day races and stage wins in Grand Tours. His victories in Amstel Gold, Strade
Bianche, and his iconic Tour de France stage win in 2022 prove that he excels in
epic one day races or individual stages. If he were to focus on the Classics
and key mountain stages in Grand Tours, Pidcock could cement his legacy as one
of the best all-rounders of his generation.
That said, it’s important to note that Pidcock is still just
25 years old. Many Grand Tour champions do not reach their peak until their
late 20s or early 30s, so it would be premature to rule out his potential as a
GC rider entirely. However, if he continues to focus solely on the Tour de
France, where the competition is fiercest, he may struggle to achieve the
results that his talent deserves.
Should Pidcock consider other Grand Tours?
Another option for Pidcock could be to shift his attention
away from the Tour de France and towards the other Grand Tours: the Giro
d’Italia and the Vuelta a España. These races often feature less intense
competition in the GC compared to the Tour, offering a potentially easier path
to a high overall finish or even a victory. Many riders have used the Giro and
Vuelta as stepping stones to success in the Tour, and this could be a path
worth exploring for Pidcock.
Read also
Riding the Giro or Vuelta would also allow Pidcock to gain
more experience in GC battles without the immense pressure of the Tour. With
fewer expectations and a less crowded field of top contenders, he might find it
easier to develop his GC skills and confidence. After all, he has the raw
talent, and with the right preparation and focus, there’s no reason why he
couldn’t one day challenge for a Grand Tour podium.
Is the relationship with INEOS doomed?
The relationship between Pidcock and INEOS isn’t necessarily
doomed, but there are clear signs that it’s under strain. The team’s recent
struggles, combined with Pidcock’s lack of development as a GC rider, have
raised questions about whether he is in the right environment to fulfil his
potential on the road. If INEOS can refocus its efforts on one-day races and
stage wins, Pidcock could still thrive within the team. However, if the team
remains fixated on GC success, it may be in both parties’ best interest to part
ways.
Ultimately, Tom Pidcock’s future is still bright, whether at
INEOS or elsewhere. His versatility and talent are undeniable, and while he may
not yet have fulfilled his potential on the road, there’s still plenty of time
for him to do so. The key question is whether INEOS can provide him with the
support and opportunities he needs to reach the next level, or whether a change
of scenery is what’s required to unlock his full potential.
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
2 Comments










