Wonderful Wout van Aert returns to winning ways at Superprestige Gullegem Cross after thrilling battle with Eli Iserbyt
Cyclocross
Wout van Aert is back! Back to his best and back to winning ways, having taken victory at Superprestige Gullegem Cross this Saturday afternoon following a thrilling battle with Belgian national champion Eli Iserbyt.
Although Wout van Aert wasn't on the front row at the start, all eyes were on the Visma star as the racing got underway. The Belgian got off to a solid start as well, but it was Michael Vanthourenhout in the lead at the end of the first lap, controlling from the front and setting a fast, but controlled pace to string things out behind.
Read also
The in-form Laurens Sweeck was also still very much in the mix and began to show himself at the front for the first time on 3, with Vanthourenhout and Van Aert quickly on the Crelan - Corendon leader's back wheel, sensing the potential danger. In truth though, any killer moves were still yet to take place with things relatively tightly packed at the front at the end of lap 3.
For the first time on lap 4 though, Van Aert made his presence known at the front of the race and immediately things exploded behind. By the end of the lap, only Vanthourenhout had been able to keep the wheel of Van Aert, 10 seconds clear of the next rider on course, Joran Wyseure. With Van Aert making a couple of small errors on lap 5 though, both Wyseure and Eli Iserbyt were soon back in contact, making a four-man group at the front.
Iserbyt was the next man to make a move too, attacking on lap 6 and getting a small gap ahead of his rivals, although Van Aert was leading the charge of the chase. As the two Belgians began to break free of Vanthourenhout and Wyseure, the fight for victory started to look like a two-horse race at the front. Despite Van Aert's best efforts though, he was struggling to fully distance the gritty and determined Iserbyt.
On the final lap, Iserbyt and Van Aert traded the front of the race in a thrilling battle. As Iserbyt suffered a couple of technical issues though, Van Aert began to get a gap and as it turned out that proved decisive and it was the three-time world champion who prevailed.
Read also
Results powered by FirstCycling.com

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 18visitors 6
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
3 Comments








