“The same stupid mistakes keep being made… it feels like a lost cause” – Matteo Trentin blasts cycling’s repeated safety failings

For all the rule changes, working groups and technology trials introduced in recent years, professional cycling is still making what Matteo Trentin describes as the same basic errors.

Speaking on the Bici Sport Podcast, the experienced Tudor Pro Cycling Team rider did not hide his frustration when asked about safety in the modern peloton.

“The situation has changed compared to years ago, but the same stupid mistakes keep being made, like in Andalucia a few days ago with a speed bump 50 metres from the finish,” Trentin said. “It feels like a lost cause.”

His reference was to a recent incident in Spain where a late course feature close to the line reignited debate about route design and risk management in sprint finishes. For Trentin, the issue is not theoretical. It is structural.

“Who has to change? The organisers? Yes, but also the riders with their sports directors, because sometimes risks are taken when there is absolutely no need,” Trentin continues.

That shared responsibility is central to his argument. While course design and finish layouts sit with organisers, Trentin also points to the culture inside the bunch. Aggressive positioning battles, marginal gambles and split-second decisions amplify whatever hazards are placed on the road.

In recent seasons, the UCI has introduced a series of safety measures through its SafeR programme, while governing bodies have increased scrutiny on barriers, run-ins and technical finishes. Yet high-speed finales continue to produce flashpoints.

Trentin’s frustration is rooted in repetition. The tools and discussions may evolve, but the mistakes feel familiar.

“And then people drag in the issue of race radios, which, in my opinion, is only talked about to hide from the real problems.”

The race radio debate has resurfaced repeatedly in recent years, with trials and proposals exploring restrictions as part of broader safety reforms. Advocates argue that radios allow teams to warn riders of hazards. Critics suggest they shape racing dynamics in ways that can increase speed and control rather than reduce danger.

For Trentin, however, that conversation risks becoming a distraction. Debating communication technology does not remove a speed bump 50 metres from the finish. It does not redesign a narrow run-in or eliminate poorly placed street furniture.

His position shifts the focus back to fundamentals.

The tension between prevention and response has been visible elsewhere this season. Almost two years after the tragic death of Muriel Furrer at the 2024 Road World Championships, a scare at the 2026 Tour de la Provence involving Soren Kragh Andersen reignited discussion around mandatory GPS tracking devices and incident detection systems.

That debate centred on how quickly a rider can be located after leaving the road. Trentin’s comments address an earlier point in the chain: why obvious risks are still being created in the first place.

Cycling has invested heavily in monitoring, barrier standards and regulatory frameworks. Yet when a veteran of more than a decade in the peloton describes safety reform as feeling “like a lost cause”, it underlines how fragile confidence remains inside the bunch.

For Trentin, the problem is not the absence of discussion. It is the persistence of preventable error. “The same stupid mistakes keep being made,” he said.

Until that changes, the wider debate around radios, tracking and protocols may continue to circle without resolution.