“At the moment, the three or four richest teams are signing all of the best young riders,” he continued. “For there to be genuine competition, the most promising riders need to join a wider range of different teams.”
UAE become the obvious reference point
Pogacar remains the sport’s dominant rider, but UAE’s strength reaches far beyond their Tour leader. Isaac del Toro has developed into a Grand Tour contender, while the roster is packed with riders capable of leading major races or serving as elite support.
That depth has allowed UAE to compete across the calendar without diluting their Tour structure, while continuing to recruit riders who would command leadership elsewhere.
“They have the means to sign the best riders every year,” Prudhomme said. “So the balance needs to be restored. But I cannot say whether a solution will be found in the coming years.”
The advantage is not confined to contracts. Development teams, altitude programmes, nutrition, equipment, coaching and specialist staff all widen the gap between the richest squads and the rest.
Christian Prudhomme on stage 1 of the 2026 Tour de France
UCI proposal failed to win team support
The debate has already moved beyond theory. In March 2024, the UCI’s Professional Cycling Council approved the principle of a team budget cap, with the aim of addressing the widening financial disparity across the WorldTour. The proposed timetable pointed towards the 2026-2028 licence cycle.
The plan stalled after the teams rejected it. UCI president
David Lappartient later said some of the resistance had come from smaller squads.
One model under discussion involved a luxury tax rather than a fixed ceiling, allowing teams to exceed an agreed threshold while redistributing part of that spending elsewhere in the peloton.
Prudhomme has used the language of a salary cap, while the UCI’s work has focused more broadly on team budgets. The difference would determine whether regulation touched only rider wages or the full performance operation.
Cycling’s sponsor model remains the obstacle
WorldTour teams remain overwhelmingly dependent on title sponsors, without the central broadcasting and commercial income seen in many sports that use salary caps.
That makes the politics difficult. Restricting expenditure does not create new revenue, secure sponsors or guarantee that smaller teams become more stable. Policing any system would be equally complicated. Bonuses, image rights, personal sponsorships, development teams and staff shared across men’s and women’s programmes would all have to be accounted for.
There is also the question of whether a cap would spread talent or merely suppress rider earnings while the best-funded organisations retained advantages elsewhere.
UAE are not alone in operating above much of the peloton. Team Visma | Lease a Bike, Red Bull – BORA – hansgrohe, Lidl – Trek and INEOS Grenadiers also possess resources unavailable to many rivals.
Pogacar’s superiority cannot be reduced to budget, but UAE’s ability to surround him with leaders, prospects and elite domestiques has made them the clearest example in Prudhomme’s argument. The UCI’s first push ended without agreement. Prudhomme has now reopened the issue while Pogacar and UAE continue to place cycling’s competitive imbalance under fresh scrutiny.