🏆 Vuelta Internacional San Juan 2023🇦🇷 Tremendo final de la segunda etapa, la victoria quedó para Fabio Jakobsen hombre del @soudalquickstep con este 🕙 4hs 22' 23". 🥇 Fabio Jakobsen 🥈 Fernando Gaviria 🥉 Jon Aberasturi #DondeTodoEmpieza #VueltaSJ2023
PREVIEW | Vuelta a San Juan 2023 stage 3 - Sam Bennett and Fabio Jakobsen face difficult challenge in punchy finish
CyclingTuesday, 24 January 2023 at 21:06
The Vuelta a San Juan 2023 will take place from the 22nd to 29th of January and will see the start of the season of many of the world's best riders. Sam Bennett and Fabio Jakobsen have both taken a win and enter the day tied in time, but the punchy finish will give a chance to other riders to succeeed.
Stage three is mostly flat however the finale will be more explosive. The stage will end at the San Juan Villicum circuit at the end of 175 kilometers and the final kilometers feature a few hilltops which can be used for late attacks, or a reduced sprint finish.
Stage 3: Autodrómo de Villicum - Aturodrómo de Villicum, 170.9 kilometers
Prediction Time
*** Sam Bennett
** Fernando Gaviria, Peter Sagan
* Fabio Jakobsen, Jon Aberasturi, Remco Evenepoel
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter today!
Nov 05, 13:04
0
Popular news
Latest comments
- First in here needs to tell everyone else which low level story we can pump clicks into to discuss humanity's trauser stain or politics, otherwise the bots will keep pushing LA data up to the content decision makers. So tired of seeing anything LA related because it does not provoke any meaningful discussion. It just provokes long held polarized views from the early 2000s.northcarolinaeric31-12-2024
- Amazing age for a man, especially an elite athlete. RIPMistermaumau31-12-2024
- Cheating can take minutes and happen completely spontaneously or (not so rare in the current world) as part of a set-up amongst many scenarios. Also cheating thresholds are completely different for everyone but I really don’t think the question is of interest seeing as it’s not true, or is there a need for any of us knowing who was accused, for what reason and by who if they themselves don’t seem interested? Another team trying to sabotage his relationship to weaken his guard for a better negotiation position in a future transfer discussion hiding behind free speech liberties, is that what you’re hoping to discover?Mistermaumau31-12-2024
- That simply cannot be true. He's been attacking and winning from afar all year before that and suddenly he bonked because he went too early, with most of that being a climb? There's absolutely no reason to believe that he did the same watts as on PdB a few days later because he went from "too far", with the efforts being 12:30 vs almost 40 minutesvappaxbipmv31-12-2024
- If Rog has to only follow, then he needs only 3 exclusive teammates, 2 for mountains and one for flats and the other can chip in where neededabstractengineer31-12-2024
- Lemond's bias against LA shows, not that it is unwarranted. The 1990-1999 era was 60% HCT era, the worst ever, completely unrestricted, God level, Its only after the 50% Hct rule came up that people came down to alien levelsabstractengineer31-12-2024
- Who cheated? When did he get time to cheat between the accidents and the races and training?abstractengineer31-12-2024
- And before anyone says this is not cycling related, sorry but issues such as FS are related to EVERYTHING. Once you understand that everything is connecting and influencing, you see through the fake safety of imagining cycling is not affected. False doping accusations would be an evident subject which could lead to catastrophic real consequences one day. If someone had spent efforts building a public accusation campaign against someone like MVDP, those beer throwing rival « fans » might have resorted to a worse form of assault believing they were justified.Mistermaumau31-12-2024
- Like I said before, everyone will place the cursor in a different place but I can guarantee you there is no such thing as true free speech, and if you were to take a small group (say 20, men and women unequally distributed to make it less artificial) of true believers, stick them on a deserted island with unlimited food and water I’d say it would take way less than just a year for them to destroy their civilization. Free speech advocates are almost always hypocrites too, arguing for it when it suits them but very quickly turning to censorship or whatever other tactics they feel comfortable with to silence those they can’t live with, That Eel on Mist is the latest to have succumbed to the reality of not being able to practice what he preaches. If you think about it probably the most perfect FSA you can find is completely the opposite of how you’d imagine one, the confessional priest, he allows you to say whatever you want without risk of consequences. The US has done many great and awful things but one thing it does very little, unlike you, is to reflect, being too busy reaching for goals (again not always very deeply thought through ones). Things people say lead to things people think, feel and act upon, if you give people total immunity for what they say it will provoke acts (every imaginable kind), often irreversible and destructive. If the US wants to enjoy the risks and accepts the costs, fine but please fight amongst and keep it to yourselves, stop exporting it. You can feel good about the artificial advantages you can claim to have obtained (let’s ignore how and the hypocrisy of preaching others shouldn’t do likewise because all of us in similar civilisation are more or less in that position) over those of us living in safer, stabler, healthier, happier, longer-lasting, more respectful and humbler societies. Nothing personal but it’s clear that if it hasn’t yet, it won’t be long before the good that comes or came from a form of free speech that existed but which users exercised with wisdom will be submerged by the harm being done by a few who are manipulating the original (contextually good, obvious and logical) INTENT of it for their agenda. Current FSA are like lawyers looking for loopholes in contracts in order to argue against the original purpose of the contract, protecting both sides equally and not allowing one side to technically knock out the other for personal gain.Mistermaumau31-12-2024
- No, it didn't. It has been debunked by the team that there was anything wrong with his feeding. Pogacar went too early and paid the price.maaiikeen31-12-2024