PREVIEW | Tour de France 2024 stage 16 - Final chance for the sprinters but crosswinds are another challenge for Tadej Pogacar
Cycling
The Tour de France has been quite difficult so far and the last true opportunity for the sprinters comes on stage 16. We preview the day in which the peloton leaves the Pyrenees and starts heading east back towards the Alps.
The third week begins with a sprint stage; perhaps the only one of the final week. This is a stage where the peloton moves east from the Pyrenees towards the Alps and finishes in the city of Nîmes.
Stage 16: Gruissan - Nîmes, 187 kilometers
All-in-all a calm day, unless the wind is present which is very possible. but profile wise it's a stage with a relatively easy start and only one small ascent to take into consideration throughout the day. The sprinters will be happy - but the pressure and risks will be through the roof as this is the final opportunity for a regular bunch sprint in the whole Tour! (No Champs-Elysées this year)
It's all about the final sprint, and it's not a technical one. The riders will not go deep into the city but finish in it's outskirts. The final corner comes with 2.5 kilometers to go and then it is a straight line into the finish. But take into consideration that the peloton will have three small roundabouts to tackle in the final two kilometers and the last of which comes with only... 450 meters to go. So positioning is key into this spot.
The Weather
Map Tour de France 2024 stage 16
The stage will not be easy at all. Likely a few sprinters won't make it. It will be very hot and very windy on the day. It'll come from the northwest which means that throughout the day there will be crosswinds and also on exposed roads. The first 85 kilometers specially will be quite threatening. Uphill, there are no signs that Tadej Pogacar can be beaten and so I very much expect Visma to give it another go in trying to surprise and take time back urgently. If the sprinters reach the finish, they will have a headwind finish.
The Favourites
Jasper Philipsen - Winner of two sprints, Alpecin have pretty much nothing they can do on this stage other than to work for Philipsen and hope for a third one. The headwind sprint favours him a lot, and I do believe the Alpecin riders are on rising form and that in a regular sprint he would be the big favourite to take the win.
Wout van Aert - Visma will be in the front that is certain. Van Aert is not in his best form, but to sprint you don't necessarily need that. He's come close to winning in sprints and if the race splits here it's likely that he will be in any front group. The more sprinters are dropped the better for him, and if the race is attacked from afar he may stand a chance even if he does some turns working for Jonas Vingegaard. Christophe Laporte, in great form, can sprint for himself, leadout or even attack the finale too.
Biniam Girmay - I dare to say the green jersey is already in the bag. Girmay is not the best pure sprinter but has raced so well throughout the whole Tour. With echelons on this stage, even without the best team, he would likely do good. In a bunch sprint he can certainly win a fourth stage.
After surviving the brutal mountain stage, the sprinters will be happy to take on the rest day. This stage could be the last of a few riders' Tour. Classics riders such as Arnaud De Lie, Marijn van den Berg and the in-form Pascal Ackermann could do very well if the crosswinds damage the peloton and could win from a reduced bunch sprint.
Mark Cavendish, Dylan Groenewegen, Fernando Gaviria, Alexander Kristoff, Bryan Coquard, Ryan Gibbons and Anthony Turgis are other riders to consider for a strong result.
It's the last opportunity for a few riders who are true heavyweights and in the final week a breakaway can succeed even on a day like this. The remaining hilly stage may give reason for a few to save themselves, but riders like Stefan Bissegger and Jonas Abrahamsen may give it a go and be dangerous.
Prediction Tour de France 2024 stage 16:
*** Jasper Philipsen, Biniam Girmay, Wout van Aert
** Pascal Ackermann, Arnaud De Lie
* Mark Cavendish, Dylan Groenewegen, Marijn van den Berg, Alexander Kristoff, Fernando Gaviria, Sam Bennett, Ryan Gibbons
** Pascal Ackermann, Arnaud De Lie
* Mark Cavendish, Dylan Groenewegen, Marijn van den Berg, Alexander Kristoff, Fernando Gaviria, Sam Bennett, Ryan Gibbons
Pick: Wout van Aert
Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment