The palmarès of Chris Froome is astonishing. 4 Tour de France overall wins, 2 Vuelta a Espana overall wins, 1 Giro d’Italia overall win, 3 times Velo d’Or winner, 2 Olympic bronze medals many Grand Tour stages, among others... When you look at it, it is something unbelievable. But Chris Froome is now viewed more as a joke than a respected champion. Why is it that?
This opinion article has been written by Lukáš Ronald Lukács.
ENORMOUS SALARY
Chris Froome has a multi-million euro salary. There is no official data on how much is that, but according to my sources, it should be from 3 to 5.5 million euros. He signed a long-term contract for Israel Premier Tech in 2021 until 2025.
It can be argued that it is funny earning that much despite having no results. But also as GCN's Cillian Kelly wrote it is not funny for his teammates who must be looking at him thinking ‘I should be getting paid more money than him’.
It’s not funny for other teams whose riders may be looking at Chris Froome and thinking 'I should be getting paid more money than him', thereby driving up the salaries across the entire sport. It’s not funny for his team to have agreed to pay him so much money and are getting nothing in return, or even they get negative publicity because of that.
HIS STATEMENTS
'I still dream about winning the Tour de France.'
'Disc brakes limit me in a good performance.'
'Time trial bikes should be banned.'
'I am finally at 100% after my crash and I feel like before my crash.'
'I was ready to ride the Tour de France.'
'My performance was bad, because of the oversight in my bike position.'
I could continue for some time, but I think it is enough to imagine what was he talking about in the last few years. Always some excuses, unrealistic dreams, or just simply lies.
Because for example, somebody cannot be ready for the Tour de France when he finishes in the next mountain stage which was in the Czech Tour in 127th place in which as a climber he should excel.
Or on his most recent statement about his bad bike position. Does it sound logical that someone who won seven Grand Tours is claiming that his saddle position is centimeters off? Does that sound credible for a rider who’s getting dropped everywhere? I leave that for the fans to judge.
HIS CURRENT RESULTS
Simply say, his current results are not worthy of the former 4 time Tour de France champion. Finishing among the last at every race is not worthy of a rider of a ProTeam.
THE RACES HE ATTEND
Racing mainly small races Tour du Rwanda, Czech Tour or Tour of Hainan… is this really worthy of the rider with that past? I don’t think so.
HE DOESN’T KNOW WHEN TO END
Many fans have that confession, that these pro cyclists know what to do or when to end their careers, but that is not true and we can see it clearly on Chris Froome.
Bring to this debate Peter Sagan. He was only 33 years old when he decided to end his career. I am sure he could have secured some contract and ride also for the next years as retiring at 33 is generally early, but he decided, that his reputation is more than money. But it looks like for Froome it is not.
Somebody can ask me, what would I do if I had been at the Chris Froome place? Easy. It is okay to try to come back after that horrific crash, but I would just try one full season in Israel Start-Up Nation in 2021 and when I see it is not going in the right way, then I would just retire. And like Benji Naesen said: You either retire a hero, or you continue long enough to see yourself become the meme.
And my final words to that: At the end of the day, I believe we should give our children and also ourselves idols not based only on results, but also based on what example they give us. Do we want to be a hero who cannot face the truth and always makes excuses or rather somebody who can face problems like a man, who knows when to end it and who knows that money is not more than how we will stay in the memories of people? Choose wisely.
Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 6visitors 5
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
4 Comments