“May have poked the bear” – Robbie McEwen warns Visma and Jonas Vingegaard that Tour de France Stage 1 success could ignite “fizzing” Tadej Pogacar
Cycling
Jonas Vingegaard begins Stage 2 of the 2026 Tour de France in yellow, with Tadej Pogacar already 12 seconds behind after Team Visma | Lease a Bike struck first in Barcelona.
Visma won the opening team time trial ahead of Netcompany INEOS and UAE Team Emirates – XRG, beating Pogacar’s team by 11.28 seconds and putting Vingegaard into the first maillot jaune of the race.
Pogacar limited the loss, finished third overall and took the first polka-dot jersey, but the opening exchange between the Tour’s two biggest favourites went to the Dane.
Speaking on TNT Sports’ The Breakaway, Robbie McEwen warned that Visma’s Stage 1 success could provoke a sharp response from Pogacar.
Read also
Visma strike first after difficult build-up
Visma’s victory came after an imperfect run into the Tour. Wout van Aert was ruled out before the race, Eduardo Affini’s start had been uncertain after a crash at the Italian Road Championships, and INEOS arrived with Filippo Ganna and Josh Tarling for a discipline that looked made for them on paper. “It looked like things were unravelling for Team Visma | Lease a Bike before the Tour had started,” said McEwen, a 12-time Tour de France stage winner.
The Australian pointed to the absence of Van Aert and Affini’s disrupted preparation as part of a build-up that had made Visma look vulnerable before Barcelona. “No Van Aert, Affini crashing in the Italian championships,” McEwen said. “Going into this team time trial, feeling like underdogs, everybody saying how much Pog is going to win by.”
Once the clock started, Visma produced the cleanest full ride. They moved ahead by Sagrada Familia, stretched their advantage on the way to Montjuic and still had Matteo Jorgenson and Davide Piganzoli with Vingegaard deep into the finale.
McEwen said there was “something important” about Visma starting as underdogs and “drawing first blood”, even while he still viewed the overall race as Pogacar’s to lose. He also joked that Visma’s ride carried the message: “Pog, who?” before suggesting the Dutch team “may have poked the bear”.

Tadej Pogacar during the stage 1 TTT at the 2026 Tour de France
Stephens: “Pog is going to be fizzing”
Matt Stephens looked beyond the 12-second gap alone. UAE finished third, kept Pogacar close to the front of the race and placed Isaac del Toro sixth overall after the Mexican helped carry the team through the Montjuic finale. “I’m not super surprised they lost,” Stephens said. “But the fact it’s Jonas who has gone into yellow, Pog is going to be fizzing.”
Read also
Pogacar also took the first polka-dot jersey, leaving Barcelona with a jersey of his own even as yellow went to Vingegaard. UAE avoided major damage, but Stephens said the difference came through the collective power Visma had shown earlier in the ride.
“Pogacar is not going to be disappointed with his team,” Stephens said. “They rode the team time trial we thought they would ride, but they just didn’t have the collective heft in the early part to do what Visma did.”
That leaves Vingegaard in yellow before the first road stage, with Pogacar 12 seconds behind and UAE already chasing the jersey they would have wanted to keep away from Visma. “How long does Pog want Jonas to be in that jersey?” Stephens asked.
Stage 2 brings the first road-stage test of the race, with a punchy finale, Pogacar in polka dots and Vingegaard defending yellow for Visma.

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment








