+0
11-06-2025 19:43
+3
11-06-2025 19:40
+2
21-03-2025 11:15
+1
21-03-2025 11:13
23-02-2025 16:30
17-02-2025 23:31
14-02-2025 19:18
13-02-2025 10:34
+5
07-02-2025 09:57
06-02-2025 11:36
+0
1stpastthepost
Yes I agree.11-06-2025 19:43
+3
1stpastthepost
Cyclingsbestfan I have to agree with you. I don't think the problem is all Auso's fault. Auso is like square peg in a round hole in that team. I can see a parting of the ways coming.11-06-2025 19:40
+2
1stpastthepost
I think that is already happening going by the comments from riders on this and other cycling sites.21-03-2025 11:15
+1
1stpastthepost
Not a chance? Give us the benefit of your insight on this statement and why there is no chance.21-03-2025 11:13
+3
1stpastthepost
That's an odd way to describe chain wear. I think most people would just call that wear. We never generally call or equate friction wear between chain and sprocket to being filed?23-02-2025 16:30
+3
1stpastthepost
If you knew any of the history of Ullrich and where he came from and the regime and influence that he was under from a very early age, you would understand why roadman is correct in his assessment. You guys just look at the big picture and react to the headlines like deer caught in the headlights.17-02-2025 23:31
+1
1stpastthepost
He has, or has had endurence. He was world champion in 2019. That sort of form is starting to look like a long time ago now. There is till time though, he is not in his 30s yet.14-02-2025 19:18
+1
1stpastthepost
"Ponderous." Hmm well observed.........13-02-2025 10:34
+5
1stpastthepost
Good job! It's been a long road since his accident.07-02-2025 09:57
+0
1stpastthepost
JoeyB we understand that what we don't know is what the reasoning behind the decision to reverse the DQ. I might have missed it but Danish Cycling haven't given an eplanation as far as I know. Did they just decide to okay riding on a bikepath 7 months later and keep any reasoning behind the reversal quiet? Very strange!06-02-2025 11:36