The outcome was devastating.
Pogacar dropped Jonas Vingegaard before the Tourmalet summit and crossed the line with more than two minutes over his great rival. A blow that, for Ares, leaves the fight for yellow badly shaken.
“There was no opposition, not even from Jonas Vingegaard, who finished over two minutes down and is already adrift on GC, but even further from any prospect that might suggest a change,” he says.
UAE’s superiority
Beyond Pogacar’s individual performance, Ares focuses on the collective strength of UAE Team Emirates, a decisive factor in explaining the stage outcome. “The stage left us a familiar reading: Pogacar is number one, indisputable, and he also has the most powerful team,” he sums up.
The commentator details how the Emirati squad picked off Visma’s domestiques one by one before the decisive move. When Adam Yates and Isaac del Toro tightened the pace, Vingegaard was completely isolated.
“When the final selection is made, there are still four UAE riders among the best. Jonas Vingegaard was very exposed there compared to UAE,” he explains. For Ares, that tactical superiority turns each Pogacar attack into a blow that is almost impossible to answer.
Tadej Pogacar, a global cycling star
A Tour decided in a single day
One of the aspects that most impressed the journalist was the scale of the gaps after the Tourmalet. Pogacar crested with barely half a minute over Vingegaard, yet finished the stage with almost two and a half minutes in hand.
“This stage was the best example of how the Tour de France can be decided in a single day,” he says. “Pogacar kicks with almost five kilometres to the top of the Tourmalet and takes 29 seconds from Vingegaard. However, over a 39-kilometre run-in there are 2 minutes 38 seconds at the finish line.”
In his view, the route favoured precisely that outcome. A long-range attack on a mythical climb, followed by a long descent and a final ascent, multiplied the differences between the favourites.
Pogacar and Del Toro, global cycling stars
Tour de France spectacle under scrutiny
But Ares’s most interesting reflection arrives when he moves beyond pure sport to pose a question he deems unavoidable: “It feels as if the Tour is over,” he admits, though he is quick to note that cycling history also shows that the unexpected can always happen.
From there, he opens a debate about how such absolute dominance affects the race’s appeal: “Anyone who isn’t a strong Pogacar supporter starts to see a story repeated so often that it loses a large share of its drama,” he argues.
And he closes with the line that distils his whole argument: “The spectacle disappears. No, Pogacar already provides it, but it needs more fight, more emotion, and more uncertainty.”
To illustrate his point, Ares recalls Alfredo Binda, the great dominator of the Giro d’Italia in the 1920s, whom organisers even paid not to race due to the lack of interest his superiority generated. He uses the comparison as a historical example, while making clear it is a reflection, not a real proposal for Pogacar.
Ares acknowledges that cycling is living a unique era thanks to the Slovenian’s talent. “We are living through a historic moment,” he insists. However, he believes it is possible to admire Pogacar’s greatness while asking whether such overwhelming dominance could ultimately impact the race’s following.
He therefore concludes by posing a question to fans: whether a rider’s superiority, however extraordinary, might end up reducing the excitement of a competition that has always thrived on uncertainty.