“It looked very, very strange” - Danish icon questions Jonas Vingegaard's 'nonchalant' Giro d'Italia tactics as Visma quickly defend strategy
Cycling
Jonas Vingegaard and Team Visma | Lease a Bike’s unusually relaxed approach during the opening stage of the Giro d’Italia has sparked debate in Denmark after former rider and long-time sports director Brian Holm openly questioned the tactic before quickly receiving an explanation from the team itself.
Throughout large parts of Stage 1 into Burgas, Vingegaard and the rest of the Visma squad spent long periods riding near the back of the peloton rather than fighting for position close to the front alongside the sprint teams. The strategy ultimately worked, with Vingegaard safely avoiding the major crash which split the peloton inside the final kilometre, but Holm admitted afterwards that he still found the approach surprising for the overwhelming favourite to win the Giro d’Italia.
“Honestly, when the big favourite and the whole team are sitting right at the very back, I think it looks very, very strange,” Holm said on Eurosport.dk after the stage. “We haven’t really seen that before. Maybe people did it back in the 1980s.”
Holm even described the tactic as slightly “nonchalant”, despite acknowledging the chaotic finale may ultimately have justified Visma’s decision. “Sure, there was a crash at the end, but I still think it looks strange when you’re the overwhelming favourite to win,” Holm explained.
Read also
“It was the slowest bike race they had ever ridden”
Holm did, however, admit there may have been a logical explanation behind Visma’s confidence at the back of the peloton during such a nervous sprint stage.
After the finish, the Danish analyst said several riders had described the opening stage as unusually calm and slow for a Grand Tour opener. “We spoke to some of the riders after the stage - Mikkel Bjerg, Oliver Naesen and Rasmus Sojberg,” Holm explained. “They said it was simply the slowest bike race they had ever ridden. They averaged 110 watts. So maybe that explains a little why they were sitting at the back and thinking nothing at all was going to happen. But we can’t avoid the fact that it still looked strange.”

Jonas Vingegaard ahead of stage 1 at the 2026 Giro d'Italia
Visma reveal tactic had already been planned
Before Stage 2, Holm and Eurosport colleague Bastian Emil Goldschmidt then directly put the questions surrounding the tactic to Visma sports director Jesper Morkov, who revealed the team’s approach had actually been discussed internally long before the Giro began.
“We’ve actually used it a couple of times this year already, both in Paris-Nice and the Volta a Catalunya,” Morkov explained. “It’s really something we started talking about after last year, and also something we discussed over the winter.”
According to Morkov, the specific design of the Stage 1 finale made it the ideal scenario to apply the tactic. “Especially yesterday, it was a perfect finish to use this tactic because we had the big wide main road,” he said. “And then there was the five-kilometre rule, and the five-kilometre rule started before we entered the technical section. So if there had been a crash out on the big roads, we could actually quite easily have ridden past that crash.”
“We use it to save stress”
Morkov also stressed that avoiding the stress and energy expenditure of fighting for position is one of the major reasons behind the approach. “It’s actually something we’ve used several times both to save energy, but also to save stress,” Morkov said. “And in our eyes, it’s a little easier to ride around a crash when you’re sitting back there.”
Holm nevertheless continued to argue that the tactic also carries risks if the race becomes more selective without crashes or neutralisations. “If the crash hadn’t happened, he could maybe have risked losing time,” Holm warned. “When you sit at the back all day, I think you lose a bit of concentration. You need to be near the front at the end of a bike race.”
The debate is also unlikely to continue unchanged into Stage 2, with Morkov already admitting Visma planned to completely reverse the approach on the more complicated terrain around Veliko Tarnovo. “We obviously need to be up there,” Morkov concluded. “We need to position Jonas. In relation to what we’ve just been talking about, it will be the opposite tactic from yesterday.”
After spending the Giro opener deliberately avoiding the chaos around the sprint teams, Visma now appear set to place Vingegaard much closer to the front as the race begins to move onto more selective terrain.
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment







