How much money did Tour de France Femmes teams earn? Full listing with €62.440,00 for Movistar Team
CyclingWednesday, 03 August 2022 at 14:00
The Tour de France Femmes has came to a conclusion this weekend as the riders rode into the Vosges where Annemiek van Vleuten decimated the competition and took the overall classification win. The race had a total prize money of almost €250.000 and here is how it was distributed amongst the 24 teams.
The top prize was obtained naturally by Movistar Team Women with €62.440,00 after the Dutch veteran's dominance in the overall classification. Two stage wins also had her top the rankings, whilst Team SD Worx followed closely. The Dutch team - with €46.490,00 - won a stage with Marlen Reusser whilst Demi Vollering finished second in the overall classification and won the KOM classification.
Canyon//SRAM Racing have finished third with Katarzyna Niewiadoma's fourth place as the highlight of the race, Team Jumbo-Visma and Team DSM followed closely after having won two stages with Marianne Vos and Lorena Wiebes respectively, alongside several days in the yellow jersey and with Vos taking home the points classification.
Three teams - Arkéa Pro Cycling Team; Human Powered Health and Stade Rochelais Charente Maritime have failed to earn any prize money, for what was a complicated race for all of them.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter today!
Apr 06, 15:11
0
Popular news
Latest comments
- Of course the dimensions have to be checked as long as pro cycling continues to be defined by a traditional bicycle definition, otherwise you open the door to all sorts of weird vehicles, like recumbants to keep the technical side easy. Obviously there can ve a completely different procedure for the check than how it was carried out here. If all went according to how reported, the team/rider should sue the official/UCI for result manipulation, this incident shows among other things, how the door is (left) wide open to corrupting officials to disadvantage people. Would be so easy to do those checks well without stressing riders. Maybe the triathlon system would be a solution ?Mistermaumau04-05-2025
- Agreed! I had forgotten about that moment, a rare misfire by UAE.RidesHills04-05-2025
- The UCI thinks that all of these formalities make it look like they're in control of things, but incidents like this one actually make them look like bumbling, incompetent fools.
santiagobenites04-05-2025 - He's one of the nicest and most humble guys at the top of the sport. Perhaps should have won another stage race already this year but for questionable UAE tactics when Buitrago got away and stole GC.Renz04-05-2025
- Completely Stupid decision yesterday of trying to help his teammateabstractengineer04-05-2025
- What a solid season he has had so far. I wasn’t really noticing bust just checked his stats. He has done only GC races, and placed 2-2-6-1-1 in them. Every single one in the top 10, and only one off the podium? That is solid work. Would have been nice to win yesterday, of course, (a solid climbing stage) but it set him up for today’s GC win. Congrats.RidesHills04-05-2025
- When are the UCI going to get rid of these ridiculous bike checks? I can understand that they would want to check for motors, but surely it makes no sense to have a rider sit on a bike that complies to a set dimension rather than have the bike set up to suit each the riders unique biomechanical needs. What is the purpose of such a dumb process? Is it just something for the guys in blazers to do?Cyclingsbestfan04-05-2025
- Speaking of “Holland” or Denmark flat, isn’t it interesting that they can produce good climbers?Mistermaumau04-05-2025
- I believe I have a pretty good idea what they’re experimenting with. It’s something that won’t work with everyone but can work REALLY well with the right personality.Mistermaumau04-05-2025
- I suspect they have clock syncing problems, two of the IDs have a post at an identical 24:52 (this time format already indicates one problem) on May 4th this year even though those posts don’t show in the chronology of Latest Posts, which indicates they also have time stamp and chronology problems too. The automated information on the internet (time, date, stock market figures, calculations, conversions, etc. are notoriously prone to programming errors and being overlooked. It doesn’t help that virtually no website has a dedicated no-reply link for users to report errors simply without having to navigate opaque hidden general contact addresses or menus.Mistermaumau04-05-2025