“Cycling must establish a system in which teams have an equal opportunity to succeed" - Jonathan Vaughters presses need for change after Visma-Soudal debacle
Cycling
For a moment, it seemed as if two of cycling's most successful teams in the modern era, Jumbo-Visma and Soudal - Quick-Step were about to merge. Ultimately this didn't transpire but EF Education-EasyPost's boss Jonathan Vaughters believes the saga shows the need for change within the sport.
“Our sport must adapt quickly to protect its athletes, teams and fans,” Vaughters writes in his column for Escape Collective. “We have to organize cycling as a real professional sport. If we were to treat our sport like the NFL, team owners and major competition organizers such as ASO, RCS and Flanders Classics would sit down and draw up a binding document that guarantees access to matches, determines the number of top-level teams and sets spending limits.”
Read also
“Such a competition would immediately create equity for teams, stabilize the sponsorship market and create a mature and sustainable sport,” Vaughters explain. “Compared to other sports, cycling offers enormous media value for sponsors on the money invested, but there is great instability.”
The fact that even all-conquering Jumbo-Visma were feeling the effects of these issues is a stark warning believes Vaughters. "Jumbo-Visma hit a wall. It almost forced them to merge. They had to keep up with the influx of oil money to maintain their success, which put pressure on their finances and put the most successful team in recent years at risk.”
Read also
“While they were consistently winning, their expenditure was higher than what the sponsorship market was willing to support. Bad luck with current sponsors made matters worse and the inability to sell shares to secure their finances left them vulnerable. They wanted to win, did what it took to win and were punished for their success by a governance system that failed to control costs and guarantee their organization a future in the sport.”
“Cycling must establish a system in which teams have an equal opportunity to succeed, characterized by financial fairness and a limit on expenditure. Everyone will start with equal strength. Some teams will thrive in this system, others will not. Yet every new sponsor or investor entering the sport can dream of winning the Tour de France," Vaughters concludes. “Financial control and a competitive structure with boundaries are two simple changes that would immediately address the instability in the sport. Neither will please everyone, but if the cry about the need to change cycling's business model is genuine, then it needs leaders willing to shape the sport. That will be in a way that may not make friends, but in a way that is good for the long term.”
Read also
Opinion: Amid merger mania, a call for financial fairness and permanent team rights - Escape Collective https://t.co/YfbhF6U1KJ
— Jonathan Vaughters (@Vaughters) October 13, 2023

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments








