"The door is a bit open": Wout Van Aert's non-participation at cyclocross Worlds may not be as finite as it seemed...
Cyclocross
Finally, Team Visma | Lease a Bike published the long-awaited winter calendar of three-time cyclocross world champion Wout Van Aert. And already in his debut in Antwerp, he'll clash heads with arch-rival Mathieu van der Poel who kicks off the 2025/26 season one week earlier. Van Aert will race extensively through the Christmas racing block, but stop at Belgian Championships at the start of January. No World Championships.
And while Van Aert will not shoot for his fourth rainbow stripes in Hulst, Van der Poel has confirmed his presence, and will try to get that 8th title which would be the historical record by surpassing the 7 that Erik de Vlaeminck also has.
But there is one reason in particular why Wout van Aert's presence at the World Championships in Hulst cannot be ruled out.
Last winter, Visma | Lease a Bike also did not make official Van Aert's participation in the battle for the rainbow jersey when his initial calendar was released. In the end, however, the Belgian did appear at the start of the Liévin 2025 World Championships, where he took yet another silver medal behind his great rival, Van der Poel himself.
Read also
Then it was only a week before the start of the World Championships that Visma confirmed Wout Van Aert's participation.

Van Aert won the Dendermonde 2025 World Cup and could do so again in Mathieu van der Poel's absence
In addition to the above, there are also statements by performance manager of Visma | Lease a Bike Mathieu Heijboer to Wielerflits:
"I don't completely refuse to participate in the World Championships. As far as we are concerned, the door is a bit open. We'll make that decision later, but for now, it's not in our plans. If we see later that he's feeling so good, that cyclocross is going well, that he's recovering well and that he's ahead of schedule, then the opportunity may come up."
Wout Van Aert's CX Calendar 25/26
- Antwerp World Cup: December 20
- X2O Trofee - Hofstade Plage Cross: December 22
- Superprestige Heusden-Zolder: December 23
- Dendermonde World Cup: December 28
- X2O Trofee - Azencross Loenhout: December 29
- Exact Cross - Mol: January 2
- Zonhoven World Cup: January 4
- Belgian Championship: January 11
Read also

Ondrej ZhasilCycling Journalist
Ondřej Zhasil is a cycling journalist at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2023. He is based in Ostrava, the third-largest city in the Czech Republic, and covers professional cycling across the main UCI competitions, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España. A key focus of his work is startlist analysis and pre-race coverage, where he examines team selections, rider line-ups, and tactical scenarios ahead of major events.
Alongside WorldTour coverage, Ondřej has developed specific expertise in junior cycling and in racing across East Asia, including competitions in China and Japan. He also maintains a broad working knowledge of other disciplines and levels, including cyclocross, while continuing to expand his understanding of mountain bike racing.
Ondřej holds a bachelor’s degree in Mathematics and Physics, which supports his analytical, data-driven approach to performance and race analysis. In his reporting, he regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment








