Vuelta a Espana 2025 Stage 18 | Filippo Ganna gives INEOS 3rd win; Almeida gains time back on Vingegaard
Cycling
INEOS Grenadiers have their 3rd stage win of the 2025 Vuelta a Espana! Filippo Ganna has powered to victory in a reduced stage 18 time trial. Meanwhile, João Almeida gained back 10 seconds on Jonas Vingegaard.
After early strong times from the likes of Ethan Vernon (13:21) and Daan Hoole (13:19), the INEOS Grenadiers' time trial specialist Filippo Ganna laid down a real marker when he crossed the line in just 13:00, setting a new benchmark, moving into the hotseat and averaging a quite ridiculous 56.2 kilometres and hour for the 12.2km course.
Mads Pedersen put in a strong showing, but eventually clocked the provisional 3rd best time, 21 seconds down on Ganna'a effort. Remi Cavagna also looked strong for a while, but eventually faded out to 21 seconds down on the Italian powerhouse. The next rider to come anywhere near Ganna's time was UAE's Portuguese Ivo Oliveira, who set the provisional 2nd fastest time, 'only' 11 seconds behind the lead.
Kelland O'Brien and Alec Segeart then threatened Ganna's time, but again, the Italian's effort proved just too strong as they had to settle for a provisional 3rd and 4th respectively at 15 and 16 seconds down.
Read also
Juan Ayuso clocked in at just over 13 seconds off Ganna, before the biggest test yet for the Italian came in the form of Swiss time trial specialist Stefan Kung. The Groupama - FDJ star had Ganna writhing in the hotseat, but ultimately couldn't improve on his rival's time, missing out by 11 seconds at the line. Jay Vine then got as close as anyone, putting in a huge effort to stop the clock less then a second slower than Ganna, sliding into a provisional 2nd place.
Then came the times of the big general classification contenders. Giulio Pellizzari stopped the clock at 13:46. His teammate Jai Hindley was quicker at 13:32. Tom Pidcock then clocked 13:30, narrowly extending his podium advantage. Joao Almeida put in a strong performance with his effort of 13:08, before Jonas Vingegaard closed out the day with his time of 13:18, losing 10 seconds to his Portuguese rival.
Read also

Félix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 22visitors 5
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
Loading
4 Comments









