Thomas Dekker questions Nairo Quintana's signing: "Quintana has paid enough for it, but why doesn't Movistar have to answer for this?"
Cycling
Nairo Quintana was signed once again by Movistar Team who look to build a stronger team in the mountains. It was a win win situation as the Colombian rider found his way back into professional cycling after a year that looked to be his last as a pro rider. However that doesn't come without it's questioning.
"It is actually special that this is possible. Cycling is the only sport where you can be positive on Tramadol. It's very strange that he grabbed that. Then it is simple in your mind to take that product anyway, while you know that they are checking for it," Thomas Dekker said in the Live Slow Ride Fast podcast. "It is allowed, but if Quintana does not provide an explanation, you as Movistar should not do it.
Read also
The Colombian had his results from the 2022 Tour de France, where he was disqualified afterwards, removed. Arkéa Samsic let it's leader go following the case and the combination of the timing and the malpractice he underwent led Quintana to spend 2023 without a team. "Why did he take Tramadol? It is a substance that is not found anywhere else, so he consciously ingested it orally," Dekker believes.
"I have a little trouble with that. You have to protect people in a vulnerable situation, because it can also end in a different way. But no clarity is given. Today's cycling is a lot cleaner, but there is a caveat to this. If you do this, the question is also: how much of a shit do you have about other things? What kind of barrier does Unzué have? Why would he do it?"
Read also
Dekker himself admitted to doing blood transfusions and taking EPO throughout his prime years as a pro. He He was suspended in 2009 and upon returning was signed by the Chipotle - First Solar Development team, months after he was reinserted back into the World Tour via the Team Garmin - Barracuda. Hence, a very similar comeback in relation to that of Quintana. However the Dutchman believes the times have changed and teams nowadays should have to provide good explanations for these situations.
"It is allowed, but if Quintana does not provide an explanation, you as Movistar should not do it," he argues. "It is 2023 and there is still a certain luxury that, as one of the largest telecom providers in Spain, gives you that opportunity, without any explanation. It's opportunistic. Quintana has paid enough for it, but why doesn't Movistar have to answer for this? Simply because it is still the old cycling style."
Read also

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Surely the UCI and the race organisers have a responsibility to ensure the best medical care is available to riders when incidents like this happen. All very well pushing for global expansion but not so good if riders lives are put at risk because medical support is not up to scratch.Andy12306-11-2026
- Well it clearly helps that this was Pidcock's own car, no?Occam06-11-2026
- The American performance at the World's road race was a masterclass in cycling tactics. If it wasn't McNulty, it might well have been Jorgensen or Simmons to take off and win in a solo break.Occam06-11-2026
- What a gimmick
Rafionain-Glas06-11-2026 - Thats only cause he rides for UAE. In any other team he would be captain in many races atleast. UAE is just to crazymiguel06-11-2026
- He seems to be the rare athlete whose passion and curiosity about life beyond his sport equals his extraordinary achievements in it. It would be great for him to risk less of that life. He seems very grateful and joyful for what he has already attained.
MarkFour06-11-2026 - As much as I admire and even revere Wout, the less I know about his backside the better.MidnightRider06-11-2026
- Ok, Walt 🤣... Vingegaard would be lucky to get on the poduim. He would not beat Seixas or Del Toro, let alone TP. Then there are the Americans...BD06-11-2026
- So, for starters. Cycling is a saturated, static/dying sport in traditional lands, it will not have resurgences like eg running occasionally does because of several obstacular (yes, I know that’s not a word but don’t make me point out the obvious at your expense) factors. Obviously, like almost everything involving money, there is a desire/need/advantage to growth and that can only come from (developing or just testing) new markets. For me, the WC is the obvious and best choice for several reasons, it comes at the end of the season so is less critical season risk wise, it is not a “pro” team race but nation based which makes integration of uncommon participation more natural. It is a vehicle for redistribution (one of a very limited number of available mechanisms to develop new markers fairly) that the fixed calendar doesn’t allow and it helps make budgets fairer over the long run (moving the whole circus to everywhere evens out everyone’s budget as opposed to having everyone always come to the same location.Jumpyjohn06-11-2026
- Sad that a more refreshing article like this, which could generate discussion in a number of directions, gets completely ignored for the importance of debating the level of superiority of one rider into every single last detail, including a majority of totally hypothetical ones. People complain there is no news in the off season and it’s boring but don’t realise how boring it is to review the same old discussion over and over again, several times a day. In fact, you’d almost think this was a rider fan website. Instead of complaining about the FREE (as long as you pay attention to data use if not unlimited coz this site consumes almost as much for loading Youtube) content, the presence of cv of authors (for the missed obvious reason that it makes it easier to insert extra advertising without changing formats), the lack of quality/checking and depth of articles, why not also think about the content, quality and variety of posts that everyone can contribute to? The platform becomes irrelevant when discussion is interesting.Jumpyjohn06-11-2026
Loading
2 Comments










