
Nicolas Prodhomme has won stage 19 of the 2025 Giro d’Italia on a monster day
of climbing, with a superb attack. He beat the main GC men, as Richard Carapaz and Isaac Del Toro put more time into Simon Yates.
Stage 19 of the race burst into action almost immediately,
with Wout van Aert launching the first attack as the peloton hit the base of
Croce Serra. It set the tone for a chaotic and aggressive day in the mountains,
with a breakaway of over 30 riders eventually forming, including key names like
Carlos Verona, Louis Meintjes, Romain Bardet, Antonio Tiberi and Pello Bilbao.
The day’s terrain offered no respite, with the peloton
already fragmenting early on the slopes of Col Tzecore. Multiple riders
including Tom Pidcock, Max Poole and Thymen Arensman were dropped as UAE and EF
Education–EasyPost set a fierce pace behind. By the time the race reached Col
Saint-Pantaléon, the gap to the front had grown to over three minutes, despite
several reshuffles within the breakaway.
Read also
Scaroni took the KOM points at the top of Tzecore,
continuing Astana’s relentless pursuit of the blue jersey. With just under 60km
remaining, the break had whittled down to ten riders, and eventually a trio of
Tiberi, Prodhomme, and Verona surged clear, carving out a 30 second gap over
the other four chasers as they sprinted through the Red Bull kilometre marker.
Meanwhile, the peloton had been reduced to around 20 riders,
with Visma and UAE alternating control on the front. Carapaz found himself
isolated with no teammates, while young Red Bull – BORA – Hansgrohe rider Georg
Steinhauser remained stuck in no man’s land between the groups.
With less than 30km to go, Tiberi was dropped from the
break, leaving just Verona and Prodhomme as the front two. Then, it was
Prodhomme who attacked, but with the peloton just 1 minute behind at that
point, he’d need a miracle to come out on top. A big surprise came when Adam
Yates was dropped, clearly not on his best day, as he was unable to support Del
Toro.
With 21km to go, the first attacks of the GC men came. And
the first came from Richard Carapaz, with Simon Yates and Isaac Del Toro
straight onto his wheel, with Derek Gee close behind. But it seemed to just be
a tester attack, as before long Rafal Majka was back at the front doing what he
does best, controlling the peloton.
With 12.6km to go, Prdohomme’s lead was 1:24, but would that
be enough? The answer seemed to be yes, as with 8km to go he had increased that
margin to 1:39 minutes. What was becoming more and more clear, was that fatigue
was really starting to affect the bunch, as most of the GC men appeared to be
more concerned about losing time, than gaining time.
Then, with 6.7km to go, finally Carapaz attacked again, but
once more Isaac Del Toro was on his wheel. Where was Simon Yates? It looked
like his pink jersey dreams were up, as he instead reacted to attack from Derek
Gee, with the Canadian gunning for his podium spot. Carapaz kept digging and
the gap to the Yates group grew to 30 seconds, but Del Toro, as he has done all
race, looked so smooth and relaxed on the bike. Eerily similar to another UAE
rider in pink 12 months ago…
In the end there was no stopping Nicolas Prodhomme. He took the win, whilst the GC battle will continue until tomorrow. For now, ISaac del Toro is looking good for the maglia rosa.
Read also
Results powered by FirstCycling.com

Félix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 52visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Just looked again at the photo. Yeah I stand by that. If MS had fallen over in Brands direction I don’t even think she would have hit her. You must be a UCI race commissioner. I’ll be sure to check my sock height should I ever see you on a ride. Looks like everyone else on here sees what I see.mij08-11-2026
- I said looking at the photo it doesn’t appear she deviated. Chill out, not stating my word is the final judgement. Just commenting that based on the photo I don’t see it. And BTW the Dutch coach even said she didn’t impede her.mij08-11-2026
- Blah Blah Blah !frieders308-11-2026
- MS said she was changing gears so that caused her slight deviation. Nothing was intentional.frieders308-11-2026
- How can you use a photo post incident to judge the incident itself (which is not hard to find if you’re prepared to invest the same amount of time in searching as writing that comment? It’s harsh but technically right even though this or worse is not always sanctioned in every race. The two things that went against MS (who unfortunately for her would still have won without making her mistake) are that it was not a bunch sprint where there could have been an overlooked incident or mitigating circumstances explaining a deviation. Everything was focused on just those 2, Schreiber was riding beautifully balanced which made her sudden deviation look unnatural stroke as if it could have been in some part intentional whilst she was slowly drifting ever closer towards the barrier to a point that would have reached obstruction level. In her defence, it might have been the realisation she was heading towards that that made her react suddenly and caused the deviation involuntarily. In any case, congratulations to her for the ride of her life, in people’s minds she will be credited for it.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- Good boy Obviously doesn’t need that much help dealing with pressure, as some have suggested. Wiser (and humbler) than many far further along their careers. About offering him the moon, recently someone came up with an explanation of the downfall of a football great (either referring to Maradona or Portuguese Ronaldo) saying it was kind of normal after coming back from the moon, except that others, including some who actually did go to the moon like Armstrong (Neil in case anyone is too switched off to realise) didn’t go through any of the same motions after coming back. A lot of how you deal with situations has less to do with the situation than with your character.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- I think that they're not really used to dealing with this type of incident in a cyclocross race, and the situation has been magnified because it was a race for a championship title. It's very unfortunate that the race had to be decided in this way.
santiagobenites07-11-2026 - Seriously why do they keep doing stupid things like this. Its one thing to relegate when the placings are minor, when the action is blatant. But when it is ambiguous, why dont they at least take advice from some higher up to avoid embarrassing themselves. This is similar to the Halland goal when his teammate was clearly offside and interfered in play and VAR gave them the goal. if you dont have evidence you cannot convict. Even for doping they have these rulesabstractengineer07-11-2026
- So all those who went to watch, including all from abroad, waled there, spent nothing? Most places hosting events of the sort manage to make it worthwhile. If it was so obviously fruitless, don’t you think by now they’d have run out of hosting candidates? Why do you think the Tour can command such high prices for departure and arrival locations? If it didn’t bring anything locally they’d have to pay to get authorisation to use cities.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- What a travesty ! That little deviation did nothing to impede Brand !frieders307-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments







