“It’ll come out…” – Bradley Wiggins claims Team Sky “chucked me under a bus” to protect someone else from doping allegations
Cycling
Former Tour de France winner and Olympic champion Sir Bradley Wiggins has alleged that Team Sky sacrificed him to shield someone else from doping scrutiny during the height of their dominance.
Speaking to The Times ahead of the release of his new book The Chain, Wiggins reflected on the doping allegations that dogged the team during his Tour-winning years, saying, “There was something greater going on. [Sky] chucked me under a bus.”
Pressed on who or what was behind it, he hinted at deeper revelations to come: “It’ll come out,” he answered intriguingly.
The accusations stem from one of the most controversial periods in modern British cycling. During Wiggins’s career, the team faced scrutiny over their use of corticosteroid TUEs in 2011, 2012 and 2013, as well as the infamous Jiffy bag delivered at the 2011 Critérium du Dauphiné. Wiggins was granted TUEs ahead of his Tour victory in 2012 — something he has always maintained was within the rules.
Read also
“I was pissing on my own grave”
Wiggins’s new book details not just the fallout of those years, but also his personal descent into addiction following his retirement in 2016.
He admits to snorting cocaine off his Olympic gold medal during the depths of his addiction: “Hundreds of thousands of people roaring me on, millions more watching at home. One of the great moments of London 2012, and there I am in a wardrobe, snorting cocaine [off my gold medal], mocking my achievement, hating it for what I believed it had brought me. It was the equivalent of pissing on someone’s grave, and in that moment, I was pissing on my own.”
The five-time Olympic champion writes of homelessness, nights spent in crack houses, and of how the glory of the Tour and London 2012 turned hollow in the years that followed.

Wiggins stands proud with his Olympic gold medal
Recovery and accountability
Now a year clean, Wiggins is in recovery through Narcotics Anonymous and says the book is part of his “apology and accountability” process. Former Tour rival Lance Armstrong also played a role in helping him enter a rehabilitation programme in the United States. “I wanted to be the teller of my own story. Good and bad,” Wiggins told The Times.
The 45-year-old has cut out alcohol and rebuilt a strict daily routine — rising at 6:15am, training in the gym, planning his meals and, crucially, riding his bike again for the sheer joy of it. “Gym helps. I go every day. I live like I’m a professional athlete,” he said.
Read also
Putting the past behind him
The book also addresses the long shadow of childhood sexual abuse at the hands of his former coach Stan Knight, which caused him to turn away from cycling after retirement. Knight died in 2003 without facing justice.
“I associated every aspect of [cycling] with Stan. If I hadn’t taken up cycling, I’d never have met that man,” Wiggins said. “I love going on my bike at the weekends. It’s phenomenal. That sense of escapism I had as a kid. Freedom. Yes.”
Having emerged from bankruptcy, Wiggins says he now has “more work than I can cope with” and a home of his own. But his remarks about Team Sky’s handling of doping allegations — and the suggestion that others may have been protected at his expense — will undoubtedly reignite debate about one of the sport’s most controversial eras.
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 14visitors 3
Top comment
ScottG10-10-202511
Wiggins is a train wreck.
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
10 Comments








