"I sometimes think it shows the race off at its worst" - Ned Boulting disappointed with double Alpe d'Huez, lack of time trialing and novelty in 2026 Tour route
Cycling
Ned Boulting is one of the most iconic voices of the Tour de France and also one of the most honest, and upon seeing the route reveal, he was not happy with it. According to the British pundit the route lacks the time trialing and the novelty whilst featuring terrain that is already well known and isn't the most spectacle-inducing.
"It sounds really counter-intuitive, after years of railing against exactly this but I now yearn for the time when you had a sort of 50, 60-kilometre flat individual time trial," Boulting said in the Never Strays Far podcast. The race features only 27 kilometers of individual time trialing and it's a very hilly one, which does not make room for the specialists to make difference. That will be a turn off for Remco Evenepoel who will move to Red Bull - BORA - hansgrohe but finds a route that is against what he thrives in.
"And I think Remco Evenepoel will be rightfully pretty disappointed that he hasn't been thrown an incentive to come to the Tour de France and ride for the victory, because the sort of rider who's going to thrive on that individual time trial is called Tadej, and Pogacar". There very much isn't a route where Pogacar won't be the favourite to win, but Boulting believes there's little room to surprise either in 2026.
"I mean, it does look like a course that, even if he turns up half-fit, he can't lose. There's no cobblestones, no obvious crosswind stages, and no gravel. That's three things that we've grown accustomed to over the last 15 years. They have denuded this year, and that feels a little bit disappointing as well," he argues.
Read also
Too much Alpe d'Huez?
"I understand it's central to the way that the Tour de France markets itself to the world, but it doesn't necessarily produce great racing. And I sometimes think it shows the race off at its worst. To do it twice seems a bit much," he said of the Alpe d'Huez, next year's big bet by the race organizers.
Stage 19 will be short and feature the entire famous ascent whilst stage 20 will only finish up the ski station, at the end of one of the most difficult stages in recent years which will also feature the ascents of the Col de la Croix de Fer, Col du Telegraphe, Col du Galibier and Col de Sarenne.
"It's the fact it's not just this 13-kilometre climb. You've got a little right-hand turn that brings you on to the last few kilometers of the climb. But you've got a descent before that, and a bit of a plateau. And before that the Sarenne climb, which itself isn't hard once you've been over the Galibier," he says of the final mountain stage, which he does not criticize directly.
"So it's just, it's more interesting. And if, if a small group gets over the Galibier together, then we've got a really good battle on our hands, potentially for the stage win."
On the finale in Paris, which will feature one ascent of Montmartre but will be better adapted to the sprinters, he is a fan of: "I'm pleased that they've altered it slightly just to put it slightly back in the balance as to whether or not a sprinter could win it".
Stage 20 of next year's Tour de France is its greatest highlight
Read also
Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 14visitors 7
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling forRafionain-Glas08-11-2026
- i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026
Loading
5 Comments