"Going to lose the Tour — no question" - Jonas Vingegaard & Visma rode like 'knuckleheads' at the Dauphiné says former Vuelta winner
Cycling
With the 2025 Tour de France now just weeks away, experts and analysts are looking into every detail of the recent performances of Jonas Vingegaard and Tadej Pogacar in order to try and predict what will come next. According to former Vuelta a Espana winner Chris Horner, the Criterium du Dauphiné showing of Vingegaard and Team Visma | Lease a Bike left a lot to be improved upon.
"I want to put myself in the shoes of a directeur sportif at Team Visma | Lease a Bike, now that Dauphiné is done," begins the American in a video on his YouTube channel. "Normally, when the Dauphiné ends — about three weeks before the Tour de France — all the DSs at Team Visma | Lease a Bike will get together and evaluate how the race went. It’s crucial, especially if anything went wrong tactically, which in this case, it absolutely did. If they don’t meet, well then... they’re knuckleheads."
That critical term can also be used to describe the performances of Visma and Vingegaard at the Dauphiné according to Horner. "If they asked me: 'Chris, what did you think about the race?' I’d say: We looked like knuckleheads. I’d point specifically to three stages: Stage 1, Stage 6, and Stage 7," explains the 2013 Vuelta winner.
Read also
On stage 1, Horner is sharp in his analysis. "Vingegaard attacked under 6km to go. It was a good move at first... The attack drew out Tadej Pogacar, which is exactly what you want early — to wear his legs down," he says. "But what followed? Vingegaard started pulling with Pogacar. That’s a cardinal mistake. You do not pull with Pogacar, Remco Evenepoel, or Mathieu van der Poel."
"After the stage, Vingegaard himself said he was surprised to only lose 4 seconds and finish 2nd. If you’re surprised by that, then the move was a mistake. A knucklehead move. And one we’ve never seen from Jonas before," continues Horner's critique. "Look at past races — like the Tour de France or Paris-Nice — Jonas always refused to work with Tadej when it risked handing him time bonuses. But here, suddenly, he pulls with Pogacar and Evenepoel? Tactically, it made no sense."

Pogacar took the stage win on the opening day of the Dauphine
As for stage 6? "This was the first of three mountain stages. UAE had only one big threat: Tadej Pogacar," Horner recalls. "So what did UAE do? They rode from the front all day, trying to reel back a break with Romain Bardet up the road. Everyone should have seen it: UAE was setting up Pogacar to attack on the final climbs. What did Visma-Lease a Bike do? They made it harder. They started drilling it with 45km to go. Sepp Kuss and Jorgenson attacked early. Why? UAE was already doing the work."
"Had they saved energy, Jonas might’ve stayed on Pogi’s wheel through the first climb, held on during the false flat, and maybe only lost a few seconds. He might even have kept the yellow jersey," Horner continues. "Instead, they rode like knuckleheads."
Read also
Stage 7 meanwhile, will go down as a misuse of resources for Visma according to Horner. "The big mountain day — 130km, with climbs like Col de la Madeleine and La Rosière. When coverage finally kicked in, we saw Jorgenson on the front of the penultimate climb. That should never happen unless you’re 100% sure Jonas can drop Pogacar right then and there — which we know wasn’t going to happen after what Pogi did on Stage 6," he notes.
"Jorgenson should’ve been up the road or saved for the final climb, so he could help Jonas close gaps when Pogacar inevitably attacked. Instead, he was burned too early," he assesses harshly. "Another tactical mistake."
"So, if I’m sitting at the table with the Visma DSs, I say this: 'We screwed up stages 1, 6, and 7. UAE rode a tactically flawless race. Pogacar only really went all-in on Stage 6 — and still won the GC,'" Horner concludes. "Jonas said he hopes to be better for the Tour in three weeks. He can be. But if we keep racing like we did here at Dauphiné, we’re going to lose the Tour — no question."
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 31visitors 19
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Are you MrMauMau 2.0? Nothing you are saying is really relevant. Vaguely connected, but irrelevant. The conversation is whether Schreiber impeded Brand or not.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
Loading
17 Comments









