Derek Gee poised for overall victory at O Gran Camiño 2025 despite losing out on stage 4 win to Sergio Chumil
CyclingSaturday, 01 March 2025 at 17:31
Derek Gee looks poised to take overall victory at the 2025 O Gran Camiño after a stunning performance on the stage 4 'Queen Stage', saw the Canadian put time into all his main rivals, despite losing out to Sergio Chumil in a two-up sprint for the stage win.
The likely deciding stage of O Gran Camiño 2025, the day was highlighted by a massive 30km or so of climbing. As the final portion of the race began, five riders remained from the breakaway, although the Israel - Premier Tech led peloton was already breathing down their necks. At 17km to go, Gee himself took control of the chase and immediately closed the gap to the break. In fact, by the time the Canadian reached the summit of the penultimate climb, only one rider had been able to keep pace with Gee, that being the somewhat surprising figure of Sergio Chumil from Burgos Burpellet BH.
With Gee re-affirming his general classification lead, the chase behind was being led by Davide Piganzoli and Jefferson Alveiro Cepeda on the final climb. Gee's main challenger at the start of the day, Magnus Cort Nielsen, was climbing admirably for someone not renowned for his ability in the mountains, but he remained around 40 seconds down inside the final kilometre. At the front meanwhile, the fight between Chumil and Gee for the stage went all the way to a photo finish, with Chumil eventually taking it.
Read also
Results powered by FirstCycling.com
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Play for FREE! Fantasy Amstel Gold Race
Apr 17, 12:51
0
Subscribe to our Daily Newsletter today!
Apr 06, 15:11
0
Popular news
Latest comments
- C’mon, she « married » an infidel, the hijab is just the missing cherry on their fatwa cake ;-)Mistermaumau19-04-2025
- Its not the innovations. The top speed is decided by the top riders. MVDP, Pogi, Pedersen all started the hostilities on the Arenberg but it also ended there. In the past the Arenberg was just the start for the first selection and with attrition it kept reducing till the finaleabstractengineer19-04-2025
- She does not wear the Hijab. So doubt they will be very welcomed by the orthodox communityabstractengineer19-04-2025
- I would say that most people would rather see an exciting or strategic race than a boring one with record average speed. Proof of this is that people have rarely complained about a past race being slow but often that it was boring. Fast speeds are often the result of wind direction though it may be true that headwinds or tailwinds influence the way a race is run and on average one may result in more interesting outcomes than the other. Obviously a high speed can become a talking point but that’s about it. I doubt any spectator could tell the difference between riders averaging 43 or 45km/h as they go past so if it weren’t for the data being presented (often wrong anyway like the gaps between different riders) on screen, no-one would know or even try to guess.Mistermaumau19-04-2025
- Agree with the first part totally, not the second. It may not be a perfect solution or needed for everyone but what’s wrong with protecting non fully developed kids? It starts when they’re born when you instinctively know you shouldn’t try to make them stand or put them in push-up positions as they’re not ready strength, bone shape or -resistance wise (amongst many things). You don’t send small kids with huge backpacks full of books to school and you don’t expect teens to lumber around building sites chucking cement sacks. There were good reasons for this and the gearing issue was a result of this, especially considering the frail stature of cyclists in general. HOWEVER, the rule has been abandoned as being unnecessary. The original idea wasn’t bad for kids in general but what it overlooked was that by the time kids actually reach the level to enter junior race level and compete seriously, they’ve done enough training to strengthen their mechanisms and over enough time for bone composition to adapt to new loads so they are unlikely to get injured from excessive loads as no-one can push more than a certain human power and they’ve worked their way close to that already. If you think it was overkill, fine but reflect on this, I trained for and had done several marathons and one day decided to enter the first edition of our local one. Despite being used to and perfectly prepared, I was in pain for weeks after and a year later the local media was full of reports of an explosion or injury related visits to doctors post-race by participants. What nobody realised in advance was that the course was very demanding on joints as much of it was in the city centre with short straights and sharp corners with pavements to mount so you were constantly also stepping up and down and leaning hard, just to show how sensitive you can be to new solicitation on the body.Mistermaumau19-04-2025
- Let us know when he beats a quality field of sprinters!frieders319-04-2025
- Agreed. What is the point of this? The pros should just start a new league and break away from the UCI. Let it sinkmij19-04-2025
- Who even cares? It’s the goal of a bike race to ride as fast as possible? And that’s what we want to see?? This is maybe the dumbest article ever.mij19-04-2025
- This is one of the worst ideas I've ever heard. It's an advantage to the person who does his best power at the highest RPM. This rule was dumb in junior races and would be dumb at the pro level.acem8219-04-2025
- More and more guys to share the spoils, of which he didn’t get many when he had a better chance. Looks thinner. I hope he enjoys battling for the Giro, maybe good for him to focus on a different kind of goal.Mistermaumau19-04-2025