"As a person, as a teammate, he was the best there is" - Former teammate states he never knew of Lance Armstrong's doping scheme
Cycling
José Azevedo has been involved in cycling for many years, some of them spent as the right-hand man of one of the most controversial cyclists of all time: Lance Armstrong. In a recent interview he has discussed the doping topic within the US Postal team.
Lance Armstrong admitted to being part of a doping network of which he was the main beneficiary, lost all his Tour de France titles and descended from heaven to hell in no time. With his descent into hell he dragged the whole sport down with him, discrediting it, driving away sponsors and was one of the main culprits in the destruction of cycling in his own country.
Even today there are those who argue that "back then everyone doped and yet he was the best", something that was considered a general rule, a habit and a common practice in the professional peloton.
José Azevedo doesn't see it that way and explains: "I don't know. But it doesn't worry me. I'm proud of my career as a cyclist. I'm proud to have ridden for ONCE, led by Manolo Sainz, who also had problems. And to have raced for US Postal and Discovery, to be Armstrong's teammate, to have Johan Bruyneel as my sports director. These are people from whom I learned a lot about cycling. In terms of structural organization, programming, planning, behaviour with the riders, even the psychological part," he says in a conversation with O Jogo.
Azevedo was part of teams that have a history of doping and nowadays nobody forgets those times and speaks ill of those teams. "It's logical that they say it, even Armstrong was involved in a big doping problem. The project had that side to it, it wasn't just Armstrong. But if I know today that Armstrong used banned substances, it's because he said so," he explains.
"Because I've never seen it. I was never harassed within the team to use doping products. It was something that completely passed me by. I had my mission in the team, my schedule, my responsibilities, I went to the races and I knew what my place was and what was required of me, to help Armstrong win. That was all I cared about."
Asked if he had ever been asked about Armstrong, Azevedo said. "I repeat what I said: I've never seen it, I've never been harassed. I did my job, I'm proud of what I did in my career. What happened, happened to him. The riders are at home, that's where they train. I don't know what goes on in other people's homes. I can speak for myself."
"And I'm not going to say anything bad about him, because as a person, as a teammate, he was the best there is. He never acted like a star, he was never disrespectful to us, he always valued our work. And we weren't there out of obligation, we were paid to work for him. And he always had a word of thanks."
The image that the American cyclist gave off was completely different from what passed on to the outside: "When we were in the hotel, on the bus, or on stages, we were all the same. When he got off the bus, he gave off an image of distance, perhaps to protect himself."
When Lance Armstrong confessed to doping, everything he had done in cycling and for cycling simply disappeared, he fell into oblivion. "Of course. Now he's seen as the biggest fraud in sport. Everyone is free to judge. I have a lot of respect, consideration and admiration for him. Despite the mistakes he made, we mustn't forget that, as an athlete, he had a lot of potential. If he won just by taking products, then there was no point in training, anyone could be champion."
Azevedo recalls the times he shared with Lance, the professional way he prepared and approached cycling. "The Tour was prepared nine months in advance and even the rain didn't stop him," he says, "Anyone who lived with him, and I had the pleasure, would start preparing for the Tour nine months in advance. It was a group of 12 riders, which was reduced to the final nine. When he started training in November, it was already with the plan for the Tour."
Azevedo revealed what he admired most about Armstrong: "I remember once, in the California area, it was raining. It was a 15-day stage and we knew it would be sunny the next day. He had already won the Tour six times and we all went to train anyway. That dedication and effort were examples to be set," he concluded.
Lance Armstrong in one of his epic battles with Marco Pantani, at Mont Ventoux
Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 79visitors 42
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
12 Comments