The Vuelta a España 2024 is close to it's start. On August 17, the peloton will take the start in Lisbon, in a very open edition where Spanish cycling can see again a winner of the general classification 10 years later with the presence of a clear candidate: Mikel Landa.
No local rider has won the Spanish Grand Tour since Alberto Contador in 2014, ahead of Chris Froome and Alejandro Valverde. However, in a year in which the lineup of participants is not the most prominent in its history, far from it, the 34-year-old Soudal Quick-Step rider is facing his big chance, as analysed by CiclismoAlDia.
Below, we look at the 3 reasons why we believe Landa is capable of finishing the three-week race as the brand new winner of the Vuelta a España 2024.
1. No major rivals for Mikel Landa
At the moment, there are no major rivals in the potential fight for the overall. That's a fact. Right now, Sepp Kuss looks like the big favorite for the win because of his status as reigning champion, when Jonas Vingegaard and Primoz Roglic ceded the win to him in 2023 after his outstanding performance over the three weeks.
And it's not like Kuss is in spectacular form either. Now in the Vuelta a Burgos, the American is competing for the first time since his retirement by COVID in the Tour de France before he can start the Grande Boucle. The same goes for Enric Mas, another favorite. The Movistar Team rider, although he finished the Tour well, was soon out of the fight for the overall, the same thing that happened to him in the previous Tour de Suisse.
In addition, neither Tadej Pogacar nor Jonas Vingegaard will be there, two riders against whom Landa would have nothing to do. Remco Evenepoel won't be at La Vuelta either, so the Basque rider won't be forced to act as his domestique. The only unknown is Primoz Roglic, who as he had to abandon the Tour de France due to a crash, the door to the Spanish grand tour was opened for him, but Red Bull - BORA - hansgrohe has not yet given any clues that the Slovenian could be there.
Mikel Landa together with João Almeida (5th and 4th) at the Tour de France. @Sirotti
2. A very tough course that does not scare him because of his great Tour de France
The route of this Vuelta a España 2024 will be very hard, and Mikel Landa is one of the best climbers in the peloton. In addition, it is worth remembering that he has just finished 5th in the overall classification of the Tour de France, as the best Spaniard in the race, and being at all times the main assistant of Evenepoel in the high mountains.
He himself, in statements made after finishing the Grande Boucle, said he was looking forward to arriving at La Vuelta. Landa is aware that he will land in Lisbon with practically unbeatable legs. This year's Grand Tour will feature six flat stages, 13 medium and high mountain stages (nine mountain stages), and two time trials.
3. The significant lack of pressure at Soudal Quick-Step
The third most important point when it comes to Mikel Landa's ability to compete to win the Vuelta a España is his role at Soudal Quick-Step. The 34-year-old arrived at the Belgian team last winter with a simple goal: to be Remco Evenepoel's main domestique in the Tour de France, as mentioned above.
The success was absolute, with Evenepoel taking 3rd overall in his Grande Boucle debut as the best of the rest behind Pogacar and Vingegaard, plus the aforementioned 5th place for Landa behind João Almeida. So it can be said that their homework was done.
This is crucial to arrive at La Vuelta without pressure. Mikel Landa is not the star of Quick-Step, Remco Evenepoel is. So he can't be required to compete for the victory. After the Tour, everything is welcome. Landa will do his race and, if he maintains the level he has given in France, I am absolutely sure he will be there in the fight to become the new winner of the great Spanish Tour.
Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 3visitors 3
Top comment
mobk07-08-20246
Almeida and Yates?
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Are you MrMauMau 2.0? Nothing you are saying is really relevant. Vaguely connected, but irrelevant. The conversation is whether Schreiber impeded Brand or not.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...Dariusz08-11-2026
- Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
- There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
Loading
3 Comments