Next Races
▼
Teams
▼
Originals
▼
Results
Previews
Startlists
More
▼
Calendars
▼
Newsletter
FAQ
cyclist
+6
Latest comments
+6
cyclist
As if road rash is the big problem in cycling crashes. Missing skin hurts, but road rash heals quickly and usually doesn't impair riders' training much. This looks like a race organizer trying to shift focus away from designing safe courses that minimize crash risks to the outcome of crashes. As an earlier commenter pointed out, summer racing suits are often designed for breathability to prevent overheating. Is it better for riders to overheat, impairing their bodies and thinking abilities (possibly causing crashes), for slightly better road rash outcomes? Probably not. The greatest risks in crashes are concussions or broken bones. While improvements in helmets have slowly improved concussion outcomes, the emphasis recently has seemingly been on their aerodynamics. If they cared, the UCI might consider changing rules around helmet design, perhaps finding whatever the most protective helmet there is today and saying no future helmet to be used in races next year can be less protective. This would force helmet companies to continue making safer helmets. Reducing broken bone chances would be much harder. Maybe we could see airbag vests like in motorcycle racing someday integrated into cycling suits, but that would only help with core injuries like ribs and spine. Again, making that breathable would be very difficult. Riders will only accept a performance disadvantage if required for all competitors. It's simpler to design safe courses than pour millions into R&D for new safety equipment and subsequently create rules requiring its use. But many race organizers continue to forgo the effort of making safer courses, instead shifting blame for rider injuries elsewhere.
13-05-2024 06:20
Load more...
Just in
INTERVIEW | "When I found back the Maglia Rosa with Carapaz I said 'what the 'hell' is going on here?" - Damiano Caruso details shock of Colle delle Finestre showdown
Dec 18, 20:00
0
"Leaving everything in good hands" - NSN DS explains why Sylvan Adams was present at team camp back in November
Dec 18, 19:00
0
"We just can't take six potential stage winners with Remco and Lipo" - Former INEOS DS wants to lead focused BORA for Tour de France GC ambitions
Dec 18, 17:30
0
"I was too eager to win" - Wout van Aert admits big mistake and blame for Visma's Dwars door Vlaanderen humiliation
Dec 18, 17:05
0
More Articles
Popular news
Pogacar’s former right-hand man feels his importance waning at UAE: "The team is of a slightly different calibre now"
Dec 18, 09:46
1
“I was a bit afraid to say it on the podium because Primoz was standing next to us” – Remco Evenepoel points to Roglic blueprint for 2026 Tour de France
Dec 18, 14:23
4
UAE rolls back the years - American Brandon McNulty confirmed to aid Tadej Pogacar in historic Tour de France bid
Dec 17, 22:30
1
INEOS Grenadiers reportedly “within 24 to 48 hours” of Oscar Onley deal as seven million euro buyout looms
Dec 18, 09:47
2
More Articles
Loading
+6
cyclist
As if road rash is the big problem in cycling crashes. Missing skin hurts, but road rash heals quickly and usually doesn't impair riders' training much. This looks like a race organizer trying to shift focus away from designing safe courses that minimize crash risks to the outcome of crashes. As an earlier commenter pointed out, summer racing suits are often designed for breathability to prevent overheating. Is it better for riders to overheat, impairing their bodies and thinking abilities (possibly causing crashes), for slightly better road rash outcomes? Probably not. The greatest risks in crashes are concussions or broken bones. While improvements in helmets have slowly improved concussion outcomes, the emphasis recently has seemingly been on their aerodynamics. If they cared, the UCI might consider changing rules around helmet design, perhaps finding whatever the most protective helmet there is today and saying no future helmet to be used in races next year can be less protective. This would force helmet companies to continue making safer helmets. Reducing broken bone chances would be much harder. Maybe we could see airbag vests like in motorcycle racing someday integrated into cycling suits, but that would only help with core injuries like ribs and spine. Again, making that breathable would be very difficult. Riders will only accept a performance disadvantage if required for all competitors. It's simpler to design safe courses than pour millions into R&D for new safety equipment and subsequently create rules requiring its use. But many race organizers continue to forgo the effort of making safer courses, instead shifting blame for rider injuries elsewhere.13-05-2024 06:20