“Omloop is going to be the first test along the Flemish roads, so you want to be good there obviously” - Stefan Küng ahead of the Classics campaign
Cycling
After a successful Classics season last year, where he finished sixth at the Ronde van Vlaanderen and fifth at Paris-Roubaix, Stefan Küng has been looking ahead to the start of this year’s campaign at Omloop Het Nieuwsblad.
In an interview with Cyclingnews, the Swiss rider said “Omloop is gonna be the first test along the Flemish roads, so you wanna be good there obviously. But the big goals, they’re in April with Flanders and Roubaix”.
On his objective for his first Flemish Classic, Küng said “top five would be good, like you’re up there in the mix but you still have chances to do it better… But I would also take the win in Nieuwsblad, I wouldn’t mind that”.
Read also
The Groupama-FDJ rider began the season well at the Volta ao Algarve, as he finished third in the individual time trial around Albufeira and ninth in the overall standings. On his start to the year, Küng said “Algarve is my first race, I’m sure if I wanted to be 100% in Nieuwsblad I probably would have started my season earlier. I know all the work I put in, it will pay off”.
After Opening Weekend, Küng will head to Italy to take on Strade Bianche and Tirreno-Adriatico, before returning to Belgium to ride the E3 Saxo Classic, Gent-Wevelgem and Dwars door Vlaanderen, ahead of the Ronde van Vlaanderen and Paris-Roubaix.
Click
here to create your own team for the Fantasy Spring Classics Men. At least $4300/€4,000/£3,420
in prizes!
Read also
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
𝗙𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗘𝗥𝗦 🟡⚫ - 𝑂𝑃𝐸𝑁𝐼𝑁𝐺 𝑊𝐸𝐸𝐾𝐸𝑁𝐷 💥
Write a comment









