Lappartient said the shrinking detection window associated with micro-dosing could require testers to act immediately rather than wait until morning. “We support the ITA if they have to carry out specific tests,”
he told Daniel Benson. “Why? Because we know that with micro-dosing EPO, it can no longer be detected six or seven hours later.”
The controls were carried out with judicial authorisation in France and reached several riders during the Tour. Their timing prompted criticism from the peloton, team staff and the CPA, with the disruption to recovery becoming almost as heavily debated as the grounds on which the tests had been approved.
“The fear that the ITA could turn up”
Micro-dosing involves using smaller quantities in an attempt to retain a performance benefit while reducing the period during which a prohibited substance can be detected.
A rider tested several hours later may therefore present a very different sample from one collected during the night. “For riders, the fear that the ITA could turn up is just as significant as the fear that the police could come,” Lappartient said.
The comparison reflected the deterrent the UCI hopes to create. The overnight operation involved only a limited number of riders, but removed any guarantee that the hours spent inside a team hotel would remain untouched by anti-doping officials.
Lappartient nevertheless ruled out making such controls a regular feature of Grand Tours. “It has to remain very exceptional,” he said. “We will not support something that is done every night to all the riders. It really has to remain exceptional.”
Pogacar described the disturbance as “inhuman”, while the timing was also questioned by other riders who argued that interrupted sleep carried consequences for recovery and safety.
The World Anti-Doping Code normally protects an overnight period from routine testing, but national authorities can approve controls outside those hours when the required legal threshold is met.
Jonas Vingegaard and Tadej Pogacar were woken in the middle of the night for surprise doping tests during the 2026 Tour
No specific suspicion
The involvement of a French judge immediately raised questions over whether the riders visited during the Tour had been selected because of information directed specifically against them. Team Visma | Lease a Bike later said it had been told that Vingegaard’s control was not based on an individual suspicion concerning the Dane.
Lappartient gave the same account of the wider operation. “In cycling, there is always suspicion, probably because of our past, but I know everything that has been done to fight
doping,” he said. “Night-time testing is a tool in that fight, but it is not a tool that should be used every day.”
No anti-doping violation involving either Vingegaard or Pogacar was announced following the controls. Lappartient instead presented their value as a warning that testing could take place before a narrow detection window had closed.
“The aim is not to wake a rider in the middle of the night,” he said. “The ITA has to say: look, we have this control available. It sends a message: we are here, and we will never give up the fight against doping. So it is not about suspicions directed at one particular rider, but a general message to the whole peloton.”
The controls did not produce a publicly announced case against either Tour leader. They did ensure that future riders considering micro-dosing could no longer assume the night would pass before a sample was taken.