“I would feel beaten before the start every single time” – Inside the peloton as Tadej Pogacar’s dominance revives cycling’s doping suspicions

Cycling
Saturday, 01 August 2026 at 14:30
Tadej Pogacar at the 2026 Tour de Romandie
Tadej Pogacar’s latest Tour de France victory did more than extend his dominance over modern cycling. It also brought the sport’s recurring credibility debate sharply back into view.
A fifth yellow jersey, another collection of stage wins and a series of record-breaking performances ensured that admiration was again accompanied by suspicion. The overnight anti-doping controls involving Pogacar and Jonas Vingegaard during the race only added to the attention surrounding the leading figures of the 2026 Tour.
No anti-doping violation involving Pogacar has been announced, and no public evidence has emerged to show that his success has been achieved through prohibited methods. Cycling’s history, however, means performances of that scale are rarely allowed to exist without questions.
Among the riders who regularly compete against the Slovenian, the reaction appears more complicated than either blind faith or outright mistrust.
Casper Pedersen, speaking to TV2 during the Tour of Denmark, accepted that continued scrutiny remains necessary while warning against allowing suspicion to harden into accusation without evidence.
“Of course, it is unfortunate that there is so much focus on it, but it is also important to make sure questions are asked if something appears suspicious,” said the Soudal – Quick-Step rider, who is representing the Danish national team this week. “On the other hand, questions are sometimes raised without any concrete reason.”

Pogacar’s dominance keeps cycling’s past close

The latest Tour was the most immediate trigger, but the debate around Pogacar stretches well beyond July.
His success now covers Grand Tours, Monuments, stage races and consecutive World Championship road titles. The Slovenian has repeatedly won across different terrain with margins and performances that have placed him alongside the greatest riders in the sport’s history.
Pedersen did not direct his remarks at Pogacar personally, but his comments came as the Tour winner’s performances were once again being viewed through the shadow left by previous generations.
Cycling has seen too many celebrated victories unravel years later for scrutiny to disappear completely. “It is a difficult balance, but it is important that, for example, the press keeps an eye on things, just as it does in other industries, so that it does not go wrong as it did in the past,” Pedersen said.
Pogacar’s performances attract attention because they are extraordinary. The absence of evidence has not prevented sections of the public from treating the scale of his dominance as grounds for suspicion.

Trust inside the peloton

The 30-year-old is now in his eighth consecutive season at WorldTour level and has seen doping discussions return at several points during his career.
“Of course, I hope our anti-doping authorities are capable of catching those who cheat,” he said. “I have to place my trust in that, because if I did not, I would feel beaten before the start every single time.”
That belief remains essential for riders spending much of the season competing against Pogacar and the small group of rivals capable of challenging him.
The Tour’s surprise night-time controls showed the intensity of the monitoring surrounding the race’s leading contenders, even as the timing itself caused controversy over disrupted sleep.
Testing, biological passports and targeted controls remain the basis on which riders are expected to trust the competition around them. Without that confidence, every exceptional performance would become an accusation and every defeat would arrive with an asterisk.

Suspicion follows the next record

Pogacar’s dominance is unlikely to face less scrutiny as his career continues. Every further record, long-range attack or emphatic victory will be placed beside both his existing achievements and cycling’s troubled past. Pedersen does not argue that those performances should escape examination, only that questions need something more substantial before becoming conclusions.
For riders inside the peloton, the anti-doping system remains the dividing line. They race, lose and return to compete again on the assumption that those breaking the rules will be caught. Without that, the result would feel decided before the flag had dropped.
claps 0visitors 0
loading

Just in

Popular news

Latest comments

Loading