Marco Pantani’s 28-year Giro record beaten as Jonas Vingegaard powers towards Grand Tour immortality
Cycling
Jonas Vingegaard’s 2026 Giro d’Italia has already delivered pink jersey dominance, five stage wins and a near-certain Grand Tour Triple Crown. On Piancavallo, the Dane added another layer, reportedly beating Marco Pantani’s long-standing climbing record on the final mountain stage.
According to climbing data shared by Ammattipyoraily on X, Vingegaard completed the first 13.61 kilometres of Piancavallo, averaging 8.15%, in 36:17 on Stage 20. That would put him three seconds faster than Pantani’s 36:20 from 1998, a benchmark that had stood for 28 years on one of the Giro’s most recognisable mountain finishes.
The Team Visma | Lease a Bike leader attacked with around 11 kilometres remaining on the final ascent, briefly taking Felix Gall with him before dropping the Austrian and sweeping past the remnants of the breakaway.
By the finish, Vingegaard had taken his fifth stage victory of the race and extended his overall lead to 5:22 over Gall, with only Sunday’s largely ceremonial final stage in Rome remaining.
Pantani benchmark falls on Piancavallo
Piancavallo already carried major Giro history. Pantani’s 1998 ride came during the season in which he won both the Giro d’Italia and Tour de France, sealing his place as one of Italian cycling’s most iconic figures.
The comparison is based on the first 13.61 kilometres of the climb. Ammattipyoraily’s data lists Pantani at 36:20 in 1998, Thibaut Pinot at 38:56 in 2017, and Jai Hindley, Tao Geoghegan Hart and Wilco Kelderman at 37:51 in 2020. Vingegaard’s 2026 effort is listed at 36:17.
Those figures should be treated as climbing analysis rather than official race timing, but the context is striking. Vingegaard already had the Giro under control, a comfortable buffer over Gall, and a final stage in Rome still to come.
Visma raced for another stage win anyway. Tim Rex, Victor Campenaerts and Bart Lemmen helped keep the breakaway within reach before Vingegaard launched on the final climb. Gall followed briefly, but the pattern of this Giro repeated itself again. Vingegaard accelerated, opened daylight, and rode alone towards the summit.
Giro domination moves into historic territory
Vingegaard now stands on the verge of joining the select group of riders to have won all three Grand Tours. He already has the Tour de France and Vuelta a Espana on his palmares. Barring disaster in Rome, the Giro will complete the set.
The manner of it has sharpened the story. Vingegaard has won repeatedly, answered every mountain question and ended the final GC stage by beating a record linked to Pantani.
Gall has been the closest challenger in the race and will almost certainly finish second overall, yet even he was distanced almost immediately when Vingegaard made his final move on Piancavallo. Jai Hindley, Derek Gee-West, Thymen Arensman and the rest of the GC contenders were left fighting for the remaining places behind.
Vingegaard’s Giro has been dominant in results, ruthless in execution and, if the Piancavallo data stands as the accepted benchmark, historically fast on a climb already loaded with Italian cycling memory. Rome should confirm the overall victory. Piancavallo gave it the record-breaking image.
Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 22visitors 15
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling forRafionain-Glas08-11-2026
- i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
Loading
7 Comments