“I don’t like being attacked” - IPT boss Sylvan Adams responds as sponsors threaten to pull out if 'Israel' isn't removed from team branding
Cycling
Sylvan Adams has found himself at the centre of renewed controversy surrounding his Israel - Premier Tech team, with the co-owner facing fresh questions over its future branding after key sponsors publicly signalled their disquiet.
Speaking at the inauguration of a BMX facility in Bugesera, Rwanda – co-funded by Adams during the 2025 World Championships week – the Canadian-Israeli businessman was pressed by Het Nieuwsblad about calls from partners Premier Tech and Factor for a change in the team’s identity. Both companies have suggested that continuing with the current name is “no longer viable” in the wake of political backlash.
“The team has issued a statement, which speaks for itself. I can’t add anything to it,” Adams said, declining to expand on the matter. Asked about the escalating protests against the squad’s participation in races, he bristled: “I don’t like being attacked.”
Read also
Vuelta backdrop
The pressure has intensified following the 2025 Vuelta a Espana, where pro-Palestine activists staged repeated demonstrations targeting Israel-Premier Tech. Several stages were disrupted, while the final day in Madrid was cancelled altogether after organisers deemed the situation untenable. The repeated flashpoints placed the team firmly at the centre of one of the most politically charged editions of a Grand Tour in recent memory.
Since then, municipalities and race organisers across Europe have raised concerns. Gran Canaria warned it would withdraw from hosting the 2026 Vuelta if the team were present, and Barcelona’s city council – which will stage the 2026 Tour de France Grand Départ – has also urged for their exclusion.

Protests caused chaos at La Vuelta 2025
Sponsorship strain
Against this backdrop, Premier Tech and bike supplier Factor have made clear that their continued involvement hinges on a rebrand. In a statement earlier this week, Premier Tech said that the “current team name is no longer viable for achieving our goals.” Factor echoed that sentiment, telling Cycling News that sponsorship would become “untenable” without change.
An Israel-Premier Tech spokesperson confirmed to Radio Canada that discussions are underway regarding the team’s “identity and branding,” though no decision has yet been made.
Read also
Adams’ remarks
At the Bugesera launch, Adams steered away from the sponsorship issue, instead drawing parallels between Rwanda and Israel. “We both lived through genocide, a word that was unfortunately invented after the Shoah,” he said. When questioned about the United Nations’ description of events in Gaza as genocide, he paused before citing population statistics: “In 1948, when the State of Israel was founded, there were 60,000 Arabs in Gaza. Today there are 1.8 million. The Jewish population hasn’t yet returned to its 1938 level. The numbers speak for themselves.”
According to Het Nieuwsblad, his communications staff were visibly uncomfortable with those remarks, with Adams later overheard voicing frustration at the line of questioning.
What next?
For Israel - Premier Tech, the combination of sponsor unease, political opposition, and race disruption has placed the team in uncharted territory. Adams may dismiss criticism as “attacks,” but unless a resolution is found over the branding issue, the squad’s place in the World Tour calendar looks increasingly precarious.
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
Loading
2 Comments









