“Bjarne Riis should be silenced” – French ex-pro slams "arrogant" Tour de France winner’s remorseless doping confession
Cycling
Former professional rider and team manager Jerôme Pineau has launched a blistering attack on Bjarne Riis, after the 1996 Tour de France winner repeated his admission of doping and insisted he felt no remorse for doing so.
Speaking on Les Grandes Gueules du Sport on RMC, Pineau accused Riis of whitewashing his past and attempting to drag an entire generation of riders into the same category.
Riis, now 61, had reignited debate around cycling’s darkest era recently when he declared: “I was completely doped. I knew exactly what I was doing. I have no regrets, because it was part of that time and of a system that we all silently accepted.”
While Riis’ doping had already been acknowledged back in 2007, it was his lack of contrition that particularly angered Pineau, who did not hold back in his assessment of the Dane. “He says this as if everyone else was in the same boat as him — but how would he know? Gilles Delion [best young rider at the 1990 Tour] rode clean. Riis, along with his Telekom gang, destroyed the careers of riders who could have done things differently,” Pineau fumed. “It’s nothing short of a disgrace. He takes money to give conferences, saying these things in front of companies. It’s shameful. People like that should be silenced.”
Read also
"Two categories make me sick"
Pineau, who later became a World Tour team manager with Direct Énergie and B&B Hotels, argued that cycling continues to give too much space to figures from the EPO era who either express no remorse, or deny their involvement despite overwhelming evidence.
“There are two types of people who need shutting up: those who say they have no regrets, and those who say ‘not me’ when everyone knows full well they cheated. They act as if they’re above it all, which is even worse. Yet they’re always given a platform, still hanging around the cycling microcosm. Both categories make me sick.”
Riis' toxic legacy
Pineau also reflected on his own dealings with Riis, who managed CSC — later Saxo Bank — throughout the 2000s, a period in which Pineau rode for rival French teams. “He used to crush us with his arrogance and his power. It’s toxic. When the Tour de France started in Denmark in 2022, he was so unpopular that he wasn’t even invited. He’s a pariah in his own country — and rightly so.”
Riis, long nicknamed “Mr 60%” in reference to his suspiciously high haematocrit levels during his career, remains a polarising figure in Denmark and beyond. Pineau pointed to the drastic transformation in his performance once he joined Telekom in the mid-1990s. “When he first rode for the French Castorama team, he couldn’t get over a bridge. Then he goes to Telekom, and suddenly he wins the Tour de France, saying ‘that’s just the system’ — while cheating. These people are sick.”
For Pineau, Riis’ career remains inseparable from blood manipulation. “There were loads of riders with a 60% haematocrit level who could just as easily have been giving conferences. I’d have been good at it myself! Riis is nothing more than a product of chemistry. His one so-called achievement was winning the Tour — but with a 60% haematocrit, of course he won.”
This kind of public intervention is rare from Pineau, who has been outspoken in the past about cycling’s ongoing struggle with its reputation. But his furious remarks underscore how raw the scars of the EPO era remain - even nearly three decades on from Riis’ yellow jersey in Paris.
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 12visitors 10
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
7 Comments







