Skip to content
Latest comments
- Ah, finally someone willing to be a bit proactive.
- So? Do you understand the way instructions, decisions and authority work?
Do you think in a football match if after a match (or even after play has gone on) a player tells the referee he did touch the ball with his hands when the referee didn’t award opponents a penalty that they will revise the score or force a replay?
You really don’t get my point, it’s not against the rider but everyone here is so emotional for her they can’t get back to an issue which needs resolving for the future and the first step (or maybe second) is to try to understand how and why it happens, none of you have contributed in the least to that. All everyone is interested in is letting everyone know they agree how unjust it was, not even sure anyone thinks that could affect anything.
- Shouldn’t you be in MOUrning?
- Maybe you don’t like it and that’s fine, we all have different sensibilities and topics that touch us, but as you try to show me, it doesn’t hurt to reflect and compare ourselves to others behaving similarly.
What precisely is the difference between a sports fan interested in every detail of his/her hero’s life and a celeb fan having the same hobby?
It’s far more interesting to learn and think about how and why (which) people do things than reading about what they are actually doing.
And just to add another level, maybe you’ll agree we don’t use the same value system for everyone, we discriminate in an enormous number of systematic ways. For example, when is the last time you saw a discussion arguing about the achievements of two politicians to compare or for that matter two business leaders apart from the comparison of hypothetical wealth accumulated?
Perhaps you misunderstood the intention?
- I don’t think I know what’s beneath the surface but I am willing to think about it, discuss it, compare it to a known past, extrapolate to a potential future and ask/try to find out truth or even take action within my powers (boycotting something or someone is within EVERY person’s reach).
If you think your attitude has more chance of changing a result, a process, a system or an institution or it just makes you feel good, keep at it but to me it looks like you’ve already given up before trying.
- All journalists should start asking the UCI uncomfortable questions, sending inquiries about the interpretation of the rules and the justification of the results. This is the only way to change anything.
- OFF TOPIC: OK, don't get mad with me... I have some very important news, something that can't be overlooked, something that can't be ignored!!!
In the new documentary Anatomy of a G.O.A.T. (released in November 2026), legendary Belgian cyclist EDDY MERCKX spoke about TADEJ POGAČAR:
Merckx: “He has revived a style of cycling that we had almost forgotten. He is now better than me.”
Key statements by Merckx about Pogačar in 2026:
- Acknowledging his superiority: This time, Merckx openly admitted, without any subsequent backtracking or reservations, that Pogačar had surpassed him and was now above him. This contrasts with 2024, when he quickly softened his remarks about Pogačar being faster.
- The possibility of a historic triple (Giro, Tour and Vuelta): During the July Tour de France (where Pogi claimed his fifth title), Merckx stated that Pogi was the only cyclist in history capable of winning all three Grand Tours (the Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a España) in a single season, provided the conditions were right and he had sufficient team support.
- Lack of serious competition: Merckx emphasised that Pogačar has no real rivals in the mountains since 2024, thanks to his extraordinary climbing ability and the fact that he continues to improve despite still being under 28 (he turned 28 in autumn 2026).
- Praise for his racing style: Merckx highlighted how Pogačar is bringing back the aggressive, uncompromising spirit of cycling's golden era, when races were not merely about calculated stages and tactical conservatism, but about attacking from long distances.
PS: Now, this is real important cycling news. This is not "boring" ... this is called making real history, not BS history. Capish?
- how else is there to look at things? we are responding to words and pictures, we are not there. your long winded replies make zero sense to anyone.
pretty much everyone but you says the same thing. MS was robbed.
somehow you think you're so smart to dig beneath the surface and discover something no one else, including the opposing coach and cyclist, saw.
lol. you are a tool.
- Pidcock finished 9th place, 29 minutes down.
he is a helluva rider, so gutsy. and he is amazing at all disciplines.
but this headline is . . .
- I know, watch the video. and listen to her competitors. it was a tricky tacky call at best. WTF is this guy talking about???
my original comment was from the picture it didn't look like anything.
Loading
