Tadej Pogacar on Van der Poel and Flanders; Van Aert's mistake; Roubaix recon and danger - "Is Roubaix the big goal?"
Cycling
Tadej Pogacar will be taking on the Tour of Flanders this Sunday looking for his second win in the Belgian monument but the truth is that surrounding him is a constant buzz over Paris-Roubaix. In a press conference hosted by UAE Team Emirates - XRG, the World Champion has talked about many of this week's hot topics.
But for Flanders there is no shadow of a doubt: "I'm here to win. The Tour is a different race than Milano-Sanremo, much harder. Cobblestones are Mathieu's favorite terrain and he is difficult to beat on them. But there are also other riders to take into account," Pogacar said as reported by Het Nieuwsblad.
And in order to do this, he should use the same tactic as in 2023, where he attacked on several occasions in the cobbled climbs before dropping the Alpecin-Deceuninck rider. "Mathieu is one of the best sprinters, so I'm going to try to avoid a sprint with him. It has to be a hard race, then the difference between us might be smaller." After losing to his rivals in a sprint in Sanremo, it would be wise to not want to take him to the line again.
However the presence of van der Poel, as both have said, benefits both as they can very much nullify the tactics of rival teams when they attack early and work together with each other. “I like his racing style and how strong he is. But if I can choose between staying home with Urska or racing against Mathieu, I would rather stay home," he joked.
He had the opportunity to watch Dwars door Vlaanderen as well this Wednesday, where he saw Team Visma | Lease a Bike come to life, decimate the competition in the hilly section of the race, but then lose the race due to a major tactical mistake as they looked to give Wout van Aert a much needed win.
However the Slovenian will not underestimate the Dutch team or van Aert himself based on that sprint alone. "Wout and Visma | Lease a Bike made a mistake yesterday. But Wout prefers bigger races and the Tour is one of his main goals, so I expect him to be good," he warns.
Pogacar travelled to France once again and this week already did another recon of Paris-Roubaix, even taking a few KOM's on key sectors of the race, a warning to his competition. “I had a nice reconnaissance and I’m looking forward to it. Is Roubaix the big goal? Uhm, I can’t say. I have to try it first and see how the race works out for me," he replies. "But I am optimistic that I can ride a good race.”
Regarding the danger of racing Roubaix as well, often a point brought up throughout the past two months, it is not too much in the head of Pogacar who has recently crashed at Strade Bianche, but argues there are more dangerous locations even when comparing to the 'Hell of the North'.
“I think the first sprint stage in a Grand Tour or Milano - Sanremo leading up to the Cipressa are more dangerous," he answers. "The decision to do it came from me. It’s one of the most important races and I wanted to do it before it was too late.”
Read also
Tadej is taking to Paris-Roubaix cobbles just fine 😜
— Velon CC (@VelonCC) April 3, 2025
The world champion set or matched fastest Strava times on three Paris-Roubaix cobbles sectors during a recon ride on Wednesday, including the five-star Mons-en-Pévèle.
📸 Tadej Pogačar pic.twitter.com/e5RmjRhnAf
Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 9visitors 8
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
2 Comments