
As the name
suggests, it is a game that revolves around the WorldTour. From Milano -
Sanremo onwards, every one-day race and stage counts. 133 in total. This makes
following the World Tour races even more fun!
How does
the game work? Before Milano - Sanremo, you select 65 riders who can score
points for you the entire year. However, you can only pick 15 riders per one-day
race and stage. This means you do not have to make choices before the
game. You will probably immediately have more than 15 starters for Milano -
Sanremo, and you will therefore have to choose who you do not play.
Each
one-day race and stage scores the top 20 of the results points. See the points
table below. In stage races, only the stage results count; the rankings do not
count. Team time-trials do not count either.
At the top of the website, there is a link to the WorldTour Manager!
At the top of the website, there is a link to the WorldTour Manager!
It is important to
find the right balance in your team because a stage in the Tour de Pologne
counts as much as a stage in the Tour de France. Spotting new talents who get
opportunities in smaller races is, therefore, certainly a part of the game. For example,
Thibau Nys scored three stage wins in Poland last year and would thus gain 300
points in one go. In comparison, João Almeida only scored 269 points in the
Tour de France, while he finished in the Top 5.
Participation
is completely FREE!
Subleagues
In addition
to a general ranking with all participants, you can also start your own subleague. To compete against friends, colleagues, and family. Will you crown
yourself as the cycling expert of Cyclinguptodate.com?
Points:
1 - 100 points
2 - 80 points
3 - 70 points
4 - 60 points
5 - 50 points
6 - 40 points
7 - 30 points
8 - 25 points
9 - 20 points
10 - 15 points
11 - 10 points
12 - 9 points
13 - 8 points
14 - 7 points
15 - 6 points
16 - 5 points
17 - 4 points
18 - 3 points
19 - 2 points
20 - 1 point
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Are you MrMauMau 2.0? Nothing you are saying is really relevant. Vaguely connected, but irrelevant. The conversation is whether Schreiber impeded Brand or not.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment






