"It was a failure – I was terrible" – 18-year-old Paul Seixas given brutal introduction to men’s elite World Championships in Kigali
Cycling
The men’s elite time trial at the 2025 World Championships in Kigali proved a baptism of fire for French teenager Paul Seixas. Stepping up to senior level at just 18, the promising star cut a dejected figure after finishing 16th, 4:14 down on runaway winner Remco Evenepoel.
Seixas stopped the clock at 54:00 on the 47.8 km Rwandan course, but his post-race words were as stark as his deficit. Speaking to France 3, he didn’t sugar-coat the experience: “I came here to learn how to handle such a long time trial, but today it was a failure. The legs just weren’t there — it’s a real disappointment to have prepared something like this and then been so poor. For the past two or three days I hadn’t been feeling as strong and I had doubts. I’m disappointed with my performance, but this isn’t the end.”
The Frenchman was equally blunt about his numbers on the road: “I can see my power values on the computer — I know full well I was terrible. It’s light-years away from what I do in training, and even further from what I can do in racing. Of course it’s a disappointment, but I came here to learn and I hope I can do the jersey proud next time.”
Read also
A brutal benchmark
Seixas’ frustration was understandable given the level of opposition. Evenepoel’s storming ride brought him a third consecutive world title in the discipline, with Jay Vine taking silver and Ilan van Wilder bronze to complete Belgium’s first ever double podium in the event.
For Seixas, who only stepped up to the professional peloton this season, Kigali offered a taste of the gap between raw promise and the razor’s edge at the very top. Yet while the Frenchman left Rwanda disheartened, the experience may ultimately serve its intended purpose: the toughest of lessons in the art of the time trial.
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 11visitors 7
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Just looked again at the photo. Yeah I stand by that. If MS had fallen over in Brands direction I don’t even think she would have hit her. You must be a UCI race commissioner. I’ll be sure to check my sock height should I ever see you on a ride. Looks like everyone else on here sees what I see.mij08-11-2026
- I said looking at the photo it doesn’t appear she deviated. Chill out, not stating my word is the final judgement. Just commenting that based on the photo I don’t see it. And BTW the Dutch coach even said she didn’t impede her.mij08-11-2026
- Blah Blah Blah !frieders308-11-2026
- MS said she was changing gears so that caused her slight deviation. Nothing was intentional.frieders308-11-2026
- How can you use a photo post incident to judge the incident itself (which is not hard to find if you’re prepared to invest the same amount of time in searching as writing that comment? It’s harsh but technically right even though this or worse is not always sanctioned in every race. The two things that went against MS (who unfortunately for her would still have won without making her mistake) are that it was not a bunch sprint where there could have been an overlooked incident or mitigating circumstances explaining a deviation. Everything was focused on just those 2, Schreiber was riding beautifully balanced which made her sudden deviation look unnatural stroke as if it could have been in some part intentional whilst she was slowly drifting ever closer towards the barrier to a point that would have reached obstruction level. In her defence, it might have been the realisation she was heading towards that that made her react suddenly and caused the deviation involuntarily. In any case, congratulations to her for the ride of her life, in people’s minds she will be credited for it.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- Good boy Obviously doesn’t need that much help dealing with pressure, as some have suggested. Wiser (and humbler) than many far further along their careers. About offering him the moon, recently someone came up with an explanation of the downfall of a football great (either referring to Maradona or Portuguese Ronaldo) saying it was kind of normal after coming back from the moon, except that others, including some who actually did go to the moon like Armstrong (Neil in case anyone is too switched off to realise) didn’t go through any of the same motions after coming back. A lot of how you deal with situations has less to do with the situation than with your character.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- I think that they're not really used to dealing with this type of incident in a cyclocross race, and the situation has been magnified because it was a race for a championship title. It's very unfortunate that the race had to be decided in this way.
santiagobenites07-11-2026 - Seriously why do they keep doing stupid things like this. Its one thing to relegate when the placings are minor, when the action is blatant. But when it is ambiguous, why dont they at least take advice from some higher up to avoid embarrassing themselves. This is similar to the Halland goal when his teammate was clearly offside and interfered in play and VAR gave them the goal. if you dont have evidence you cannot convict. Even for doping they have these rulesabstractengineer07-11-2026
- So all those who went to watch, including all from abroad, waled there, spent nothing? Most places hosting events of the sort manage to make it worthwhile. If it was so obviously fruitless, don’t you think by now they’d have run out of hosting candidates? Why do you think the Tour can command such high prices for departure and arrival locations? If it didn’t bring anything locally they’d have to pay to get authorisation to use cities.Jumpyjohn07-11-2026
- What a travesty ! That little deviation did nothing to impede Brand !frieders307-11-2026
Loading
4 Comments








