“I know what it’s like to be criticised and labelled the ‘bad guy’" - Jasper Philipsen shows support for Bryan Coquard in first comments since Tour de France abandon
Cycling
As the first 2025 Tour de France reaches its first rest day, one of the biggest casualty of the first 10 stages has been Alpecin-Deceuninck sprint star Jasper Philipsen, who, after winning stage 1, was forced to abandon the race on stage 3 after a violent crash.
Speaking out on the incident for the first time, Philipsen has urged fans to stop their criticisms of Bryan Coquard, his Cofidis rival, who ultimately was the one who bumped the Belgian hard to the ground at the intermediate sprint on stage 3, leaving Philipsen with a broken collarbone and some broken ribs.
“It was just a racing incident,” Philipsen said in comments collected by Wieler Revue. “I know what it’s like to be criticised and labelled the ‘bad guy.’ In this case, Coquard was singled out, but there was really nothing he could’ve done differently.”
Read also
Coquard himself cut a very emotional figure in his interview after the stage, offering Philipsen a heartfelt apology for the Tour ending crash. Ironically, the pair were actually talking about the dangers of modern sprinting just moments before the incident occurred.
“I even told him we should avoid taking risks, and he replied that he was just following the wheels," Philipsen recalls. "I never say things like that before an intermediate sprint — crashes there are so rare. But then it happened. Almost like a self-fulfilling prophecy. Just incredibly unlucky.”

After the crash, the first teammate on the scene to support Philipsen was Gianni Vermeersch. “I remember asking him if it looked bad. He was in a bit of a panic, and within a few seconds, I realised myself that it was over. Then the pain really hit — both physical and emotional,” recalls Philipsen. “In the end, it only lasted three days for me... Winning the first stage definitely softens the blow — and no one can take the win or that yellow jersey away from me. But I had big ambitions and was in great shape. That’s the brutal side of this sport, but it’s part of the deal.”
Now, the recovery begins. “Given the circumstances, things are moving in the right direction. My wounds have healed, and that shows the body was in top condition — it bounces back faster. I haven’t been on the bike yet because of the collarbone fracture, but I no longer need painkillers and I’m regaining mobility each day,” he says of his current condition. “Early on, I had a lot of neck pain too. At the hospital, they discovered the collarbone break was more complicated than expected. My AC joint was dislocated, and the collarbone had shifted into my trapezius muscle, which extends up into the neck. It was worrying for a moment, but I never panicked.”
And so for the remainder of the Tour de France, Philipsen will be a keen TV viewer at home. “Lots of people have popped by to check in on me and take a look at the jersey. It’s still sitting in the living room. I haven’t found a place for it on the wall yet," he smiles in conclusion. "As for the rest of my suitcase? It’s still not unpacked. In some ways, the Tour feels like it’s still going.”
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 11visitors 7
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Are you MrMauMau 2.0? Nothing you are saying is really relevant. Vaguely connected, but irrelevant. The conversation is whether Schreiber impeded Brand or not.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He is boring
leedorney08-11-2026 - To Twoje przemyślenia te bla, bla :)
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Uwielbiam patrzeć, jak wyjeżdża na czoło peletonu i zaczyna się rzeź...
Dariusz08-11-2026 - Yeah, unreal.
parisbound0008-11-2026 - there needs to be space in life for pointless comments!Ketterechts08-11-2026
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026
Loading
2 Comments








