During the broadcast, the three analyzed the situation from different angles, but shared common ground: bringing in influencers can help connect cycling to new audiences, yet there must be alignment between the chosen profile, the content to be produced, and the image a race like La Vuelta seeks to project.
“They chose the wrong person and the wrong approach”
Javier Ares was blunt in assessing the organizers’ decision. He argued that the idea of involving a content creator is understandable, especially as social media plays a growing role in promoting sport. “As content creators, of which there are so many, I think it’s fine,” he explained.
The problem, according to Ares, was the execution. “They picked the wrong person, they picked the wrong approach,” he said on air. He sought to separate Jons’s responsibility from the decision to hire her, arguing that if the organizers assigned her that role, the influencer was simply doing the job she had been given.
Ares also focused on the content of one interview that triggered the backlash. Without personally attacking Jons, he felt some of the methods used could be problematic within the context of a professional race. “I don’t want to question the poor woman, she’s not to blame,” he noted, before insisting responsibility should rest with those who designed the strategy.
His reflection went beyond La Vuelta itself. Ares criticized the apparent contradiction of outlets that condemn such content while helping it go viral. “If we’re reproducing it to gain traction, then we shouldn’t complain,” he said. In his view, the controversy feeds on itself precisely because traditional media rebroadcast what they claim to deem inappropriate.
Erola Jonas at the Vuelta a Espana
“It’s interesting to bring in content creators”
Juan Antonio Flecha agreed that involving content creators can be a useful tool for any major sporting event. The former rider argued that opening the door to different profiles can help cycling reach viewers who do not usually follow a race through traditional channels.
“I think it’s interesting at certain times to bring in some content creators, influencers, whatever we want to call them,” Flecha said. However, he immediately added a caveat: “When the profile perhaps matches what the race is and what you really want to convey.”
For the Eurosport pundit, that was where the main mistake lay in this case. Flecha said the organization itself understood the choice had not been the best and that, after the controversy, new restrictions were set on what content could be produced during the race.
“I know for a fact that La Vuelta acknowledges the mistake, that the profile wasn’t the right one,” he stated. His view again placed the emphasis on the organizers rather than the individual hired, arguing the core responsibility lies with those who shape the communication strategy.
Flecha also stressed the ability of influencers to attract new audiences. “It’s interesting to bring in new people or from different sectors,” he said. The key, in his opinion, is to ensure that extra audience joins cycling without sacrificing basic standards of professionalism and coherence with the competition.
Six million followers, an opportunity
Alberto Contador rounded out the analysis by highlighting one argument that likely led La Vuelta to back Jons: her vast reach on social media. Having a creator with millions of followers can be a way to connect the race with a young audience that consumes sport mainly on digital platforms.
“They have six million followers, for young people,” Contador noted, acknowledging that scale can be a major opportunity for a competition seeking to expand its audience. The former rider, however, made it clear that a large community should not be the sole criterion when choosing a profile.
“Obviously always with basic standards that I think, in this case, weren’t being met,” he concluded. That view sums up the shared position of the three pundits: social networks are now inseparable from modern cycling, but the pursuit of virality cannot be divorced from the nature of the competition.
Eurosport’s debate thus ended without rejecting new formats at La Vuelta, but questioning how to use them. Ares, Flecha, and Contador agreed that content creators can play a role in cycling’s growth, but also that the choice of profile and the limits of their work must be carefully defined. The Erola Jons controversy has therefore become a broader discussion about the collision between journalism, entertainment, social media, and professional sport.