"You either have this or you don't": Zonneveld sees in Del Grosso the "X-factor" which makes Van der Poel special
Cyclocross
The National cyclocross Championships weekend brought about many impressive performances as well as surprises, but perhaps the greatest was witnessed in the women's elite race at Dutch Championships. In the most anticipated race of the women's cyclocross branch, Lucinda Brand was the outright favourite. But... something was wrong and the 36-year-old was "only" third for the first time in nearly year.
"She didn't feature at all," journalist Thijs Zonneveld begins his analysis on the In de Waaier podcast. "She was dropped in the first lap and we haven't seen her since. That's pretty strange, considering you've won pretty much every race this year."
Brand provided the extreme cold as a reason of her poor performance. "It's different when it's this cold. Everyone has a tipping point where their performance starts to decline. When you're so focused on keeping warm, you have a problem. It might be different from one day to the next, but of course, there are riders who can handle that better than others."
The race was won by the in-form Ceylin Alvarado. "She's riding well. She started the season later, of course, due to knee problems." Zonneveld believes this to have been her advantage over the "over-raced" Lucinda Brand who barely caught a break since October.
In any case, we shouldn't draw any conclusions from this race towards the World Championships set three weeks from now. Taking place on the home course in Hulst, the Dutch ladies will be again pushed to the maximum of their abilities by Dutch fans. And Zonneveld is convinced that Brand can "absolutely" turn things around and be back to her best self there.
"These courses are really different than when the rain thaws. Then you get mud courses, and those are much more power-driven and less technical. That's really different. There's a good chance it will be mud in Hulst. That's a real advantage for Brand, because you see how technically skilled Alvarado is."
Del Grosso walks in Van der Poels footsteps
On contrary, the men's race lacked a clear favourite, although the name of Tibor del Grosso would be brought up more often than anyone else's. And even though it was far from a walk in the park, the Alpecin-Deceuninck rider's determination was rewarded with a successful defense of the national title.
But his closest rivals deserve a word of praise from Zonneveld as well. "I really enjoyed [Lars] Van der Haar and [Pim] Ronhaar, how they didn't let it go. But also how cool Del Grosso remains, even when he falls."
Zonneveld was mainly focused on what was, for him, the defining moment of the race: "Del Grosso jumped off his bike, over the rails, and when he jumped back on, his pedal got a little tap, which caused the chain to fall off."
A disaster for a mortal human, but nothing that would stop the man looking to surpass Mathieu van der Poel: "He put his chain on while riding! He was clipped in, pedaling, saw there was no pressure on his chain, and then put it on with his hand while riding. I love that. It looks so easy, but it's not that easy, especially when it's cold."
Tibor del Grosso relived the sensations of when he secured the Dutch title last year
"That was so smooth and so fast," Zonneveld continues admiringly. "He lost a few seconds, and that was it. If that happens in a different way, like him having to get off the bike or getting his chain stuck, then you really need time. You might lose the National Championships that way."
And so the comparison with the great Mathieu van der Poel is inevitable. "This is the X-factor. This is Van der Poel's way of saying: 'I'll just knock a pebble away' or 'I'll save myself from a crash where everyone else would have crashed.' These are the little things... you either have this or you don't. You see that in him, and you'll see it even more in the coming years," concludes Zonneveld.
Ondrej ZhasilCycling Journalist
Ondřej Zhasil is a cycling journalist at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2023. He is based in Ostrava, the third-largest city in the Czech Republic, and covers professional cycling across the main UCI competitions, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España. A key focus of his work is startlist analysis and pre-race coverage, where he examines team selections, rider line-ups, and tactical scenarios ahead of major events.
Alongside WorldTour coverage, Ondřej has developed specific expertise in junior cycling and in racing across East Asia, including competitions in China and Japan. He also maintains a broad working knowledge of other disciplines and levels, including cyclocross, while continuing to expand his understanding of mountain bike racing.
Ondřej holds a bachelor’s degree in Mathematics and Physics, which supports his analytical, data-driven approach to performance and race analysis. In his reporting, he regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments