Thijs Zonneveld on 'mentally broken' van der Poel at the end of the Tour of Flanders: "You can see him collapsing. He gets exhausted"
Cycling
Thijs Zonneveld is one of the most vocal and popular voices in the Netherlands when it comes to cycling commentary, but his outlook on Mathieu van der Poel's Tour of Flanders wasn't the best. He believes the defending champion blew up trying to follow Tadej Pogacar, whilst with a different tactic he may have hung on in the end.
"Van der Poel quickly caught up there; he got back on the wheel with an impressive display of power. But that took a toll on him," Zonneveld argued in the In de Waaier podcast regarding the second Oude Kwaremont ascent. "Either he should have moved along with Pogacar, or he should have positioned himself better".
On the Oude Kruisberg, where the duo dropped Mads Pedersen: "There too, you think: he has excess energy. Afterward, he says: I never had excess energy and was always at my limit. From his perspective, I can understand that because he is used to better legs. He is even more used to having a surplus. Perhaps by closing the gaps so quickly, he wanted to say: I am very good. But in retrospect, it exhausted him. I think he handled that sloppily."
Read also
The Dutchman then cracked the final time up the Oude Kwaremont, quite spectacularly in fact, as he was then caught by the Wout van Aert group and hung on to survive the remaining climbs. "It is quite possible that van der Poel does not fully sense what is going on. I feel that van Aert has a better feel for it and can pace himself better because he often finds himself being dropped. It doesn't happen to van der Poel that often," he argues.
"Every time he gives the impression that he is great: he controls everything, he is powerful, explosive, aggressive. But then they turn onto the Oude Kwaremont, and Van der Poel is perfectly on his wheel. But then it's just very simple. Even before the cobblestones, you can see him collapsing," Zonneveld believes. Whether this was bound to happen or not, it was clear that Pogacar's pace was too much for all of his rivals. "He gets exhausted. His head goes down, his elbows out, and then you see the gap widening."
Read also
From there on it seemed like no-one in the chasing group believed it was possible to reach victory, and they were all past the limit and thinking of second place then. "You're up against four, with a headwind to the finish: you don't have any chance. But it never looked like it was going to happen (he refers to the chance of catching Pogacar, ed.). What van der Poel did in the last kilometers was worthless. What he did was almost disturbing. He is also mentally broken; he puts everything into following Pogacar. He fought the duel, and he rode to win. The others rode for a chance to win."
On Pogacar, Zonneveld can also continue to praise a rider that defies most odds and continues to make history when it comes to the riders in the modern peloton. "You would almost forget that this is the winner of the Tour de France, the winner of Liège, who has now won for the second time—the world champion. I have said it before, but he is the best rider ever. And he may be eleven Monument races behind Eddy Merckx, but that was a different era. And he is still so young. While others increasingly focus on specific races, he only expands his range. If this does not significantly impact his tour campaign, he will continue to do so in the coming years."
Read also
Your Ronde podium. 👏🏼
— Lukáš Ronald Lukács (@lucasaganronald) April 6, 2025
1. Tadej Pogačar
2. Mads Pedersen
3. Mathieu van der Poel
📷: #RVV25 pic.twitter.com/87HXFrfJgv

Rúben SilvaEditor-in-Chief
A founding contributor to CyclingUpToDate since its launch in January 2022, Ruben Silva has played a central role in shaping the site’s editorial direction and long-term growth. Before joining the project, he built his experience through independent blogging at Echelons Hub and by producing race previews for Ciclismo Internacional, developing a strong analytical voice rooted in daily engagement with professional cycling.
Beyond editorial work, he has been closely involved in the expansion and coordination of CyclingUpToDate’s wider network, helping establish and support sister platforms across multiple languages. This includes ongoing collaboration with CiclismoAlDia (Spanish), CiclismoAtual (Portuguese), WielrennenUpToDate (Dutch), and RadsportAktuell (German), contributing to a shared editorial vision and consistent international coverage.
He also helps oversee editorial governance across the network, setting standards for accuracy and consistency and coordinating updates or corrections when needed.
Originally from the Porto metropolitan area in Portugal, he holds a bachelor’s degree in Geography. His path into cycling journalism was shaped not through formal media training, but through independent reporting, community engagement, and sustained on-the-ground involvement in the sport.
Over the course of his career, he has conducted approximately 100 interviews across road cycling and cyclocross, ranging from one-to-one conversations and online formats to press conferences and on-site pre- and post-race coverage. His interviews include leading riders, team managers, and prominent figures within cycling media: Tadej Pogacar, Jonas Vingegaard, Mathieu van der Poel, Primoz Roglic, Wout van Aert, Joao Almeida and Tom Pidcock; managers like Patrick Lefevere and Joxean Matxin; and YouTube personality Bryan Kennedy (BKXC)...
Within 18 months of launch, he helped grow CyclingUpToDate’s English-language platform into one of the most-read cycling news websites, built entirely from the ground up. As both a professional journalist and lifelong cycling enthusiast, his focus remains on delivering accurate, timely, and well-contextualized coverage.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- That is a very lazy way of putting it but so far on this website it seems like everyone is happy to look at everything lazily, even things that annoy them intensely. All they want to do is state their feeling and position but ask most to analyse a problem or come up with solutions or improvements and you’re stunned by silence. Nobody even really knows how this all happens. It’s very simple and quick to just say the UCI did it but I bet you they didn’t, I bet you not more than 2 people were involved, more likely just 1. The UCI may be ultimately responsible but it is not their decision, this is about hierarchy, power and delegation. The fact that protest is possible also means it isn’t over and that MORE people could get involved for a thorough review which could throw up anything. It is highly likely it was a sole commissar who decided and has that power in a first round. Therein might lie the problem the UCI has to consider, is it acceptable to give so much authority to one single person when it is quite possible for them to have a natural bias or be too easily susceptible to imposed bias. Who is to say an individual in this position isn’t susceptible to collaboration with outside players with interests in the results, nations, families, teams, betting companies, etc. On the one hand we have sports where these problems have been worked on way more to reduce such problems, on the other hand we have sports with far stricter and more draconian rules not even concerning safety or obstruction that nobody really questions like false starts or stepping out of lane or zones in athletics. If cycling hastowork on itself, it would be good if protagonists (all kinds) would start doing a little more than just moaning over outcomes.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Yes, so why not make comments less pointless?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- What a race! I didn't expect Vanthourenhout to collapse like that, and Wyseure did take the fight to Nys, but there was no doubt at the end. I also wonder what Aubin Sparfel would be capable of were he to race in the elites now. In the U23 ranks he is making good work of Giel Lejeune, who himself is among the better riders in the elites, and a top 10 contender in the big races (3rd at Kleebergcross, 8th at Berencross and 5th at Heerderstrand). In the French Cup, Sparfel is significantly better than Romain Debord (8th at Koppenbergcross and 10th at the Euros) and Rémi Lelandais (12th at Koppenbergcross and 19th at the Euros).
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - There really was nothing in it. Schreiber was so much faster, and Brand was fighting to stay in the wheel in the sprint. Schreiber did move a bit, but to say she closed the door doesn't make sense because Brand couldn't enter it anyway, abd she wasn't impeded.
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026
Loading
2 Comments










