2026 Tour Down Under route is revealed - Old Willunga Hill headlines another World Tour opener
Cycling
The 2026 WorldTour season will, as usual, begin in Australia, with the Santos Tour Down Under scheduled from January 20 to 25, kicking off the international racing calendar.
Organizers have unveiled a challenging route that blends opportunities for sprinters with decisive mountain stages, including a historic triple ascent of Willunga Hill in the penultimate stage, which is arguably Australia's most iconic ascent.
This edition may be even more exciting than usual given that current World Champion and Tour de France winner Tadej Pogacar is rumoured to start his season there for the second time, aiming to add that race to his ever-growing palmarès.
This is the 2026 route
For only the second time in the event’s history, the race will open with a 3.6-kilometer prologue in Adelaide, testing riders’ early-season form against the clock. A special rule will force riders to tackle the prologue with a road bike instead of a time trial one, which might cause unexpected results.
Stage one, a 120-kilometer loop starting and finishing in Tanunda, includes three climbs of Menglers Hill, though on its less steep side. Despite over 1,500 meters of elevation gain, the profile still favors fast finishers, as the average gradient of Tanunda is just 3.9% and ends 15km from the finish line.
Read also
Stage two introduces a far tougher profile. Riders will face Norton Summit (10 km at 4 percent) right from the start before tackling two ascents to the brutal and explosive Corkscrew Road (2.4 km at 9.7 percent), the last one finishing less than 10km away from the finish line. It will be the first opportunity to test the general classification contenders.
Stage three offers a mixed terrain that again could suit sprinters or opportunists. A hilly day with, however, only two categorized climbs that aren't the steepest. Sprinters with good climbing skills have an excellent opportunity in this stage.
Stage four is set to be the queen stage, featuring three ascents of Willunga Hill (3km at 7.5%, with a steepest section of 11 per cent and 220 metres of total elevation gain) for the first time in the race’s history. The 176-kilometer route includes one early climb, a long flat section and two decisive ascents in the finale, where the GC is expected to be settled.
The race concludes with a final circuit around Stirling, a rolling stage that may give a last opportunity for attacks before the overall classification is finalized. The circuit features only one climb with an average gradient that does not seem too punishing on paper (2km at 4%). However, it includes a tough section with an 11% gradient that will be the perfect spot to set attacks.
Women’s race also returns with demanding mountain stages
The Santos Women’s Tour Down Under (January 17-19) will precede the men’s race, featuring equally demanding terrain.
The first day will be the queen stage for the women, as they will have to tackle Willunga Hills three times as well, although an easier section with just 4.2% average gradient. They will finish atop Willunga, so it will be the perfect scenario for a climber or even a puncheur to take the win and the first GC jersey.
The second day will feature a rolling terrain, with many hills to be passed throughout the day. It is not the best terrain for pure climbers, but they will climb Paracombe (around 1km at 2.2%, but a short 9.5% section) four times in the last part of the stage, which might make it hard for pure sprinters to survive.
The last stage will be decisive for the general classification, featuring a double ascent to Corkscrew Road (2.4km at 9.7%) that will end right before a short descent to the finish line in Campbelltown.
The women's peloton will remain in South Australia for a one-day ProSeries race, the Schwalbe Classic, on January 21: a flat 94.2-kilometer circuit around Tanunda with a flat profile that will allow the sprinters to finally shine.
Read also
Read also

Félix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- as excellent as maga rednecks chloe dygert (and quinn simmons)?Ketterechts09-11-2026
- so what i understand is: i left a comment calling out the endless author CVs for being an unnecessary flex of expertise, and you responded by lecturing me (and others) on discrimination and value systems. hats off to you. you definitely lost me!Ketterechts09-11-2026
- I just love the flood of Americans into the top ranks of world cycling. In addition to being studs on the bike, they all seem to be excellent emissaries for our country.Occam09-11-2026
- ANATOMY OF A G.O.A.T. EDDY MERCKX about TADEJ POGAČAR: Merckx: “He has revived a style of cycling that we had almost forgotten. He is now better than me.” Key statements by Merckx about Pogačar in 2026: - Acknowledging his superiority: This time, Merckx openly admitted, without any subsequent backtracking or reservations, that Pogačar had surpassed him and was now above him. This contrasts with 2024, when he quickly softened his remarks about Pogačar being faster. - The possibility of a historic triple (Giro, Tour and Vuelta): During the July Tour de France (where Pogi claimed his fifth title), Merckx stated that Pogi was the only cyclist in history capable of winning all three Grand Tours (the Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a España) in a single season, provided the conditions were right and he had sufficient team support. - Lack of serious competition: Merckx emphasised that Pogačar has no real rivals in the mountains since 2024, thanks to his extraordinary climbing ability and the fact that he continues to improve despite still being under 28 (he turned 28 in autumn 2026). - Praise for his racing style: Merckx highlighted how Pogačar is bringing back the aggressive, uncompromising spirit of cycling's golden era, when races were not merely about calculated stages and tactical conservatism, but about attacking from long distances. PS: This is not "boring" ... this is called making real history, not only statistical history. Capish?PogiSloFans09-11-2026
- It’s off-season mate, I’m bored and fed up with the mediocrity of people unwilling to provoke change when they admit things aren’t right. What have you done lately to make anyone realise you won’t put up with things? What conversation, are you dictating to me which part of the incident I have to be interested in or telling me other parts are taboo? That’s what I guess the UCI would really like, let them moan, let it blow over for them pass on to the next thing, let’s keep the status quo, let’s try our best not reviewing or revealing anything about decision-making just like every time before, they’re used to it by now so we can take the risk they’ll never give us grief.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- As far as CUTD headlines go this is far from the worst. It helps if you look at it twice and realise it’s a list of descriptions from distinct events. You can’t deny the reality of being a rival if you consider the picture immediately below, frontrunner is unfortunate but I’m guessing this time it’s more a linguistic failure than a clickbaiting opportunity. Just a reminder that this is not an anglo website, for those who find it too tedious to interpret text to get the gist of things which are rarely of great importance (as opposed to eg purposely biaised DOJ extradition translations in order to achieve hidden agendas), there are plenty of anglo cycling websites google can suggest.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Ah, finally someone willing to be a bit proactive.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- So? Do you understand the way instructions, decisions and authority work? Do you think in a football match if after a match (or even after play has gone on) a player tells the referee he did touch the ball with his hands when the referee didn’t award opponents a penalty that they will revise the score or force a replay? You really don’t get my point, it’s not against the rider but everyone here is so emotional for her they can’t get back to an issue which needs resolving for the future and the first step (or maybe second) is to try to understand how and why it happens, none of you have contributed in the least to that. All everyone is interested in is letting everyone know they agree how unjust it was, not even sure anyone thinks that could affect anything.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Shouldn’t you be in MOUrning?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Maybe you don’t like it and that’s fine, we all have different sensibilities and topics that touch us, but as you try to show me, it doesn’t hurt to reflect and compare ourselves to others behaving similarly. What precisely is the difference between a sports fan interested in every detail of his/her hero’s life and a celeb fan having the same hobby? It’s far more interesting to learn and think about how and why (which) people do things than reading about what they are actually doing. And just to add another level, maybe you’ll agree we don’t use the same value system for everyone, we discriminate in an enormous number of systematic ways. For example, when is the last time you saw a discussion arguing about the achievements of two politicians to compare or for that matter two business leaders apart from the comparison of hypothetical wealth accumulated? Perhaps you misunderstood the intention?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
Loading
2 Comments










