Skip to content

Richard Plugge resigns as One Cycling director - Controversial Super League gains momentum with powerful investor

Cycling
Richard Plugge during the 2026 Tour de France
The project that set out to transform cycling’s economic and sporting model is entering a new phase. Richard Plugge, head of Visma - Lease a Bike and one of the leading forces behind One Cycling, the Cycling Super League, is no longer leading the initiative.
His departure took effect on 25 May, according to Daniel Benson, although the Dutchman will remain involved as one of the project’s supporters.
The organisation will also leave its original identity behind. One Cycling has been renamed Collective Cycling Group (CCG) and is trying to revive a proposal that met strong resistance from the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI).
The change of name and leadership comes alongside a new funding structure involving major investors, including Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund.
Plugge had been One Cycling’s leading advocate since its inception. The initiative brought together several professional teams, including Visma - Lease a Bike, and race organisers such as Flanders Classics, which runs numerous spring events. Its aim was to make major changes to cycling’s structure and secure greater financial resources for the sport as a whole.
Richard Plugge at stage 12 of the 2026 Tour de France
Richard Plugge, head of Visma.

Richard Plugge steps down as leader as an outsider to cycling takes over

The Dutchman is no longer in charge, however. According to Daniel Benson, he stepped down from the role on 25 May and was replaced by Oliver Ciesla, a German executive with experience in the automotive industry but no notable track record in cycling.
The handover marks a significant change in the initiative’s management, but it does not mean Plugge has severed his ties with the project. The head of Visma continues to support it as it seeks to move forward under a new name and with a reworked structure.
One Cycling has faced opposition from the UCI from the outset. The international governing body argued that the proposal did not fit within the existing regulatory framework and also questioned its sporting coherence.

The UCI blocked the project and threatened to withdraw licences

In mid-2025, it made its position clear in a statement: “The project was deemed incompatible with the UCI’s administrative and regulatory framework and, moreover, lacked sporting coherence.”
The warning went beyond a simple institutional disagreement. UCI President David Lappartient sent a letter to the parties involved, urging them to stop the initiative. He also warned that teams and races continuing to take part could risk losing their licences.
The dispute put a project seeking to reshape key aspects of professional cycling in a difficult position. Even so, its backers have not abandoned the idea. The transition from One Cycling to Collective Cycling Group reflects an effort to keep the proposal alive, though its relationship with the sport’s governing body remains unresolved.

Saudi money remains behind the new structure

Funding remains central to CCG. One of its key investors is Ivan Glasenberg, the South African billionaire who already has a direct connection to cycling through his ownership of bicycle manufacturer Pinarello.
Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) is also still involved. The fund has a presence across various areas of sport and has been exploring opportunities to expand its influence in the sector for some time. It previously sought a partnership with the Giro d’Italia, but those talks did not lead to an agreement.
Saudi involvement gives Collective Cycling Group’s plans considerable financial weight, but also raises questions about their viability. The war in Iran could partly weaken the fund’s investment capacity, although Jeremy Whittle suggests the project is becoming more realistic.
The main question remains the UCI’s position. The organisation rejected the original proposal and even raised the prospect of sporting consequences for those who continued to back it. One Cycling has changed its name, leader and structure, but there is no sign that its institutional dispute has been resolved.
For now, Collective Cycling Group is seeking a way to push through a reform with significant financial backing, but it must still overcome opposition from the body that governs world cycling.
claps 0visitors 0
loading

Just in

Popular news

Latest comments

Loading