“Only if Pogacar crashes out” – De Gendt praises Evenepoel but doesn’t believe he will win the Tour de France
Cycling
With just five days until the Grand Départ in Lille, Remco
Evenepoel is preparing to line up at the Tour de France for only the second
time in his career. But already, expectations are sky high.
The Belgian made an impressive debut in 2024, winning a
stage, taking home the white jersey, and finishing third overall behind Jonas
Vingegaard and Tadej Pogacar. Now, heading into the 2025 edition, he carries
the weight of a nation and the hopes of a team that believes it finally has a
rider capable of toppling cycling’s established Grand Tour giants.
Read also
But is belief alone enough?
Evenepoel’s challenge is framed clearly by one of Belgium’s
most seasoned professionals. Speaking to Cycling News, Thomas De Gendt was
blunt about the scale of the task ahead.
“To be honest, when Tadej Pogacar is this strong coming into
the Tour de France, and I wouldn't want to wish this on anybody, but the only
way that Remco Evenepoel can have a really good chance of winning is if Pogačar
crashes out,” De Gendt said. “Otherwise it's going to be very, very difficult
for Remco – or anybody else, for that matter – to be even close.”
Read also
That sentiment might sound harsh, but it’s rooted in the
simple reality of Pogacar’s form. The Slovenian enters the Tour fresh from
dominating the Dauphine and winning countless races in the spring, whilst
Evenepoel is yet to reach his peak form yet.
“The interesting thing of course is that in Remco's mind,
probably not even Pogacar is out of reach,” De Gendt continued. “But that's
because if you're in his position and you assume Pogačar is out of your league,
then you've already lost before you start. The same goes for Vingegaard: he
will not be thinking about second place, only about winning.”
“Remco has, and people mustn't take this in a negative
sense, a big ego. By which I don't mean anything bad, more that he likes to
prove himself,” De Gendt said. “Just look at when he had an off-day on the
Tourmalet in the 2023 Vuelta a España when even I passed him on the climbs and
he was not looking at all well. Yet 24 hours later, Remco was flying again.”
Read also
The deeper point De Gendt makes is that Evenepoel is wired
differently. His response to failure is not retreat but retaliation. He doesn’t
just want to win, he wants to become the very best in the sport.
“Those kinds of turnarounds aren't to prove something to the
public... it's almost like he wants to prove his worth not only to himself but
to his team, too: that he's always up there with the best riders, that he's
worth riding for and worth their investment.”
Evenepoel's recent showing at the Critérium du Dauphiné was
something of a mixed bag. He won the time trial, beating Pogacar by almost 45
seconds over 13 kilometres, but ultimately finished fourth overall, once again
losing significant time in the mountains.
Read also
That win in the time trial has given Evenepoel hope for the
first week of the Tour, which features a similar TT. De Gendt said: “I believe
I know Remco well enough to know that he thinks that he can beat Pogačar in the
first week time trial. After all, Remco took almost 45 seconds on him in 13
kilometres in the Dauphiné TT. And if he wins that first week TT and then
doesn't lose so much time in the mountains, Remco will be thinking he can maybe
beat Pogačar on GC.”
But the mountain stages remain the decisive battleground,
and that's where the questions about Remco’s Tour-winning credentials linger.
Compared to the best climbers in the world, Evenepoel still seems vulnerable, especially
on long, high-altitude days.
De Gendt acknowledges that, “Remco's also realistic, though,
and he'll know it's a hard task. But that attitude is part of a champion's
mentality.”
Read also
The one thing Evenepoel might have in his favour is timing.
While Pogacar has been on top form all year, Evenepoel’s season has been
structured to build through the summer after his crash in December. De Gendt
believes the Dauphiné might have been a necessary part of that process.
“Mentally, this week in the Dauphiné will likely have taken
a bit of a toll on him,” he said. “But even so, it's not hard to think he will
be performing much better in the Tour and maybe can overtake Vingegaard in the
standings.”
“Remco can build his form, too, and maybe he needed the
Dauphiné to get to a higher level to where he needs to be to win the Tour. The
same goes for Vingegaard. Of course, it will be difficult, but there's still
some way to go to the hardest stages of the Tour, and a lot of things can
happen.”
Read also
Fin MajorCycling Journalist
Fin Major is a UK-based writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2024. He is the site’s main writer for FAQs and evergreen explainers and has written around 2,000 pieces for the platform. Alongside this work, he focuses on in-depth analysis and covers the biggest races on the calendar, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, providing clear context around performance trends, tactics, and key storylines.
In his reporting, Fin uses reputable data sources such as ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical context. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. Outside of writing, Fin is an active cyclist, which supports his practical understanding of the sport and its demands.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
1 Comments












