"Maybe these protests are helping, maybe they are not really" - World Tour sprinter fears complaints may be falling on deaf ears
Cycling
Matevz Govekar believes professional cycling may need more visible demonstrations from riders to push safety concerns higher up the agenda. The Bahrain - Victorious sprinter argues that private feedback does not always translate into meaningful changes, whereas public protests can attract media attention and put pressure on race organizers and the wider sport.
Speaking on the Domestique Hotseat, the Slovenian discussed the five-minute stoppage at Il Lombardia in October, when the peloton refused to begin racing in response to a series of dangerous incidents involving vehicles on race routes.
The protest followed a delivery van entering the course at Coppa Bernocchi and a collision between two riders and a police motorcycle travelling in the opposite direction at Tre Valli Varesine.
The demonstration also came in the wake of the death of 19-year-old Finlay Tarling, who was killed in a collision with a vehicle during the Volta a Portugal in August. At Il Lombardia, Remco Evenepoel addressed the crowd in Bergamo on behalf of the riders, demanding better guarantees that competitors could race without vehicles entering the course.
For Govekar, the incident showed why riders sometimes need to take their concerns beyond the usual channels.
“There are many people trying to improve things who say that cyclists have to be more vocal,” he said. “They want us to be vocal with feedback, but you don’t get the feeling that this feedback actually makes a big difference. When the races are stopped, like it was in Lombardia, there is a bigger media impact behind it. In the end the media has an impact, and that’s how it should be.”

Matevz Govekar won a bunch sprint stage at the 2024 Tour of Britain
Govekar sees public pressure as a possible catalyst for change
The Slovenian is unsure whether the Il Lombardia demonstration will lead to more protests in the future. “Maybe these protests are helping, maybe they are not really,” he said. “If incidents like that keep happening, I can imagine they will continue, and if things get better, they will stop.”
While securing race routes remains a complicated challenge, Govekar also sees potential in improving the protective equipment available to riders. “I’m not saying I would wear knee pads or elbow pads, but the airbags that are starting to be developed could add a big positive benefit,” Govekar said.
The Slovenian compared the possible introduction of airbags with the adoption of helmets, which initially faced resistance from riders before becoming compulsory in professional road racing in 2003.
“Riders didn’t wear helmets because they were hot. Nowadays, when you have a full aero helmet and it’s super hot outside, you feel it’s five degrees hotter inside. Maybe at first there will be races where you say it was unbearable to have an airbag on your jersey. But you need to start somewhere, and then the product will improve.”
Read also
Tour of Guangxi highlights the risks of sprint finishes
Govekar's experience at the Tour of Guangxi, his final race of the 2026 season, offered another perspective on the issue. He praised the road closures and traffic management in China, but identified the sprint finishes as particularly demanding and dangerous.
“You easily reach 60km/h even without descending,” he said. “These sprints in China are super hectic. You come into the sprint ten guys in one line, and there are quite a lot of elbows.”
Govekar hopes the ongoing debate will lead to gradual improvements across the sport. “There is a lot of discussion going on, and I hope it improves,” he concluded. “It always has to be a process that keeps getting better.”

Félix SernaCycling Journalist
Félix Serna is a writer at CyclingUpToDate and has been part of the team since 2025. He covers professional cycling across both the men’s and women’s calendars, with a focus on UCI rankings, race developments, and rider performance. His work includes interview-based reports, liveblogs, and tournament coverage designed to provide clear, accurate context throughout the season.
In his reporting, Félix regularly uses ProCyclingStats for results, statistics, and historical reference. He places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles promptly when new, verified information becomes available. He holds a bachelor’s degree in International Studies.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- ANATOMY OF A G.O.A.T. EDDY MERCKX about TADEJ POGAČAR: Merckx: “He has revived a style of cycling that we had almost forgotten. He is now better than me.” Key statements by Merckx about Pogačar in 2026: - Acknowledging his superiority: This time, Merckx openly admitted, without any subsequent backtracking or reservations, that Pogačar had surpassed him and was now above him. This contrasts with 2024, when he quickly softened his remarks about Pogačar being faster. - The possibility of a historic triple (Giro, Tour and Vuelta): During the July Tour de France (where Pogi claimed his fifth title), Merckx stated that Pogi was the only cyclist in history capable of winning all three Grand Tours (the Giro d'Italia, Tour de France and Vuelta a España) in a single season, provided the conditions were right and he had sufficient team support. - Lack of serious competition: Merckx emphasised that Pogačar has no real rivals in the mountains since 2024, thanks to his extraordinary climbing ability and the fact that he continues to improve despite still being under 28 (he turned 28 in autumn 2026). - Praise for his racing style: Merckx highlighted how Pogačar is bringing back the aggressive, uncompromising spirit of cycling's golden era, when races were not merely about calculated stages and tactical conservatism, but about attacking from long distances. PS: This is not "boring" ... this is called making real history, not only statistical history. Capish?PogiSloFans09-11-2026
- It’s off-season mate, I’m bored and fed up with the mediocrity of people unwilling to provoke change when they admit things aren’t right. What have you done lately to make anyone realise you won’t put up with things? What conversation, are you dictating to me which part of the incident I have to be interested in or telling me other parts are taboo? That’s what I guess the UCI would really like, let them moan, let it blow over for them pass on to the next thing, let’s keep the status quo, let’s try our best not reviewing or revealing anything about decision-making just like every time before, they’re used to it by now so we can take the risk they’ll never give us grief.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- As far as CUTD headlines go this is far from the worst. It helps if you look at it twice and realise it’s a list of descriptions from distinct events. You can’t deny the reality of being a rival if you consider the picture immediately below, frontrunner is unfortunate but I’m guessing this time it’s more a linguistic failure than a clickbaiting opportunity. Just a reminder that this is not an anglo website, for those who find it too tedious to interpret text to get the gist of things which are rarely of great importance (as opposed to eg purposely biaised DOJ extradition translations in order to achieve hidden agendas), there are plenty of anglo cycling websites google can suggest.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Ah, finally someone willing to be a bit proactive.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- So? Do you understand the way instructions, decisions and authority work? Do you think in a football match if after a match (or even after play has gone on) a player tells the referee he did touch the ball with his hands when the referee didn’t award opponents a penalty that they will revise the score or force a replay? You really don’t get my point, it’s not against the rider but everyone here is so emotional for her they can’t get back to an issue which needs resolving for the future and the first step (or maybe second) is to try to understand how and why it happens, none of you have contributed in the least to that. All everyone is interested in is letting everyone know they agree how unjust it was, not even sure anyone thinks that could affect anything.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Shouldn’t you be in MOUrning?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- Maybe you don’t like it and that’s fine, we all have different sensibilities and topics that touch us, but as you try to show me, it doesn’t hurt to reflect and compare ourselves to others behaving similarly. What precisely is the difference between a sports fan interested in every detail of his/her hero’s life and a celeb fan having the same hobby? It’s far more interesting to learn and think about how and why (which) people do things than reading about what they are actually doing. And just to add another level, maybe you’ll agree we don’t use the same value system for everyone, we discriminate in an enormous number of systematic ways. For example, when is the last time you saw a discussion arguing about the achievements of two politicians to compare or for that matter two business leaders apart from the comparison of hypothetical wealth accumulated? Perhaps you misunderstood the intention?Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- I don’t think I know what’s beneath the surface but I am willing to think about it, discuss it, compare it to a known past, extrapolate to a potential future and ask/try to find out truth or even take action within my powers (boycotting something or someone is within EVERY person’s reach). If you think your attitude has more chance of changing a result, a process, a system or an institution or it just makes you feel good, keep at it but to me it looks like you’ve already given up before trying.Jumpyjohn09-11-2026
- All journalists should start asking the UCI uncomfortable questions, sending inquiries about the interpretation of the rules and the justification of the results. This is the only way to change anything.averagecyclist09-11-2026
- how else is there to look at things? we are responding to words and pictures, we are not there. your long winded replies make zero sense to anyone. pretty much everyone but you says the same thing. MS was robbed. somehow you think you're so smart to dig beneath the surface and discover something no one else, including the opposing coach and cyclist, saw. lol. you are a tool.mij09-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment









