Arkea–Samsic has extended contracts with three riders, Maxime Bouet, Anthony Delaplace and Kevin Ledanois. The trio has extended their stay with the French team for one more year.
Maxime Bouet has been with the team since 2019 and he has no plans to leave the team yet. “To extend within the Arkéa-Samsic team is always a sign of confidence on the part of the team. I work in favour of my leaders, with a collective spirit without any ulterior motives almost all season I love my job, I still have this same professional conscience that, as on the first day, inspires me. In 2023, I will be as I have always been: diligent, focused on my job, and serious with the added possibility of potentially having a UCI WorldTour calendar ahead of us,” said Bouet.
Read also
Anthony Delaplache has been a part of the Frech formation since 2014 and he plans to spend a decade here. “I arrived in 2014, it will be ten years, next year that I belong to the teams led by Emmanuel Hubert. Few runners have a career like this these days,” expressed Delaplache.
Kevin Ledanois is grateful to the team for giving him one more chance despite a bad performance this season. “ I had a really difficult 2022 season, and to see that the team trusts me for 2023 touches me. I am aware that many riders in a situation like mine would not have obtained a contract extension. It's gratifying because it means that I do my job well when I'm able to do it, which I intend to demonstrate again next year.”
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment