“He’s so much better than Pogacar was at 20 years old” - Bruyneel, Hincapie and Martin heap praise on Paul Seixas after Il Lombardia

Cycling
2026-10-11_08-14_Landscape
Paul Seixas' victory at Il Lombardia has taken the comparisons with Tadej Pogacar to another level, with Johan Bruyneel, George Hincapie and Spencer Martin arguing that the Frenchman has already built a superior one-day record to the Slovenian at the same age.
Seixas became the youngest winner in Il Lombardia history on Saturday, riding clear on Civiglio and finishing 48 seconds ahead of Enric Mas in Como. It added a first Monument victory to a 2026 season in which he has already finished second at Strade Bianche and Liege-Bastogne-Liege and won La Fleche Wallonne.
Speaking on The Move podcast, Bruyneel ran through the results that have put Seixas in that company. “He starts off the season, he gets second in Strade Bianche, behind Pogacar,” said Bruyneel. “Then the next one, Pogacar's not there, Fleche Wallonne, he wins. Three days after, Pogacar's there, second to Pogacar. And now the other Monument that Pogacar's not there, he wins.”
Bruyneel did not need the rest of Seixas' season to make his point. “It's pretty impressive, man,” he continued. “I'm pretty sure I'm forgetting other one-day races, but just to name those four, that's like, okay, you can basically hang your whole career on those results.”
Paul Seixas crosses the finish line at Il Lombardia 2026
Paul Seixas crosses the line at Il Lombardia 2026

“It's not even a competition”

Hincapie then raised the age-for-age comparison directly. “You can almost say that might be even better than Pogacar at 20 years old,” he suggested.
Martin's response was immediate. “Oh, it's not even a competition,” before he went further still: “He's so much better than Pogacar was in one-day racing at 20 years old.”
The four races highlighted by Bruyneel are not the full picture either. Seixas also finished second at the GP de Montreal in September, losing out to Isaac del Toro after helping to break apart the favourites on the final ascent of Camillien-Houde.
By the time he arrived in Lombardia, Seixas had already accumulated major one-day results across the spring and autumn against several of the strongest riders in the world. The win in Como was the first time that run had produced a Monument victory.

And then there is the Tour

What makes Seixas' season harder to judge purely through the Classics is everything he has done between them. He won the Itzulia Basque Country overall in April, taking three stages along the way, after already winning a stage and finishing second overall at the Volta ao Algarve earlier in the year.
Then, still only 19, he finished fourth overall on his Tour de France debut and became the youngest rider ever to finish inside the race's top five. Martin brought that result back into the discussion. “And then Johan, in the middle of all that, he gets fourth in the Tour de France.”
Lombardia has now given Seixas his first Monument victory to go alongside that Tour de France top five, with the Frenchman only having celebrated his 20th birthday in September.
Pogacar had not yet won a Monument at that age. Seixas already has one.
claps 13visitors 5
loading

Top comment

RidesHills02:587

I disagree with these experts, because the comparison isn't valid yet. Seixas is exciting as hell to watch, but so was Pogačar at this stage in his career. Seixas just finished his second season, and to me, it's not about age, it's about season, so the age of 20 isn't the important thing. All his 8 wins are in this second season, with the Itzulia Basque Country GC plus La Flêche Wallonne and Il Lombardia, and his second places to Pogačar are notable. In comparison, though, Pogačar was set up as a GC rider in his first two seasons, and won the Volta ao Algarve and Amgen California tours in his first year (8 wins), plus the aggressive podium at the Vuelta that announced him as the climber he was, before winning the Volta a la Communitat Valencia and the Tour de France in his second year (another 9 wins). That he has ended up as the dominant monuments winner of his era (better than van der Poel?! my god) was nobody's prediction, but had Alaphilippe's move not disrupted the entire sprint at the delayed Liége race that year, who knows what we might have noticed a little earlier. Point being, their first two seasons on the world tour don't align with each other perfectly, and Pogačar's statistics are better. This should be no surprise. Pogačar has one main rival during classics season, and nobody ever mentions the other, and then the other rival during grand tour season, when everyone forgets the first (van der Poel and Vingegaard, obviously). Will Seixas compete with him equally in both classics and tours, in future years? The cycling fan in me hopes so! Right now, the show is amazing, better when they are on the same circuit, and Seixas is still young. A hand off across the generations will happen someday, to someone. But, I am pretty sure Pogačar would have ended up with the Vuelta, Worlds, and Lombardia had he not crashed at the Vuelta, but he crashed, and such is life, and maybe he returns in full force and maybe not. That's cycling, either way. It's fabulous to have the show, that's for sure.

Just in

Popular news

Latest comments

Loading