"He has an untouchable sprint. So, chapeau" - Matteo Jorgenson bows to Tadej Pogacar after stage 7 of 2025 Tour de France
Cycling
Despite the best efforts of Team Visma | Lease a Bike on stage 7 of the 2025 Tour de France, there was no denying Tadej Pogacar victory on the Mur-de-Bretagne, as the Slovenian powered to the win ahead of Jonas Vingegaard, reclaiming the Yellow Jersey in the process.
Matteo Jorgenson was, as always, closely attached to Vingegaard and Pogacar in the finale. Afterwards, he spoke in comments collected by Cyclism'Actu about just why Team Visma | Lease a Bike continues to be quite so active at the front of the peloton over recent stages. "The reason we’re using the team is to put us in position and make sure we’re up front to save energy," the American explains. "So, Jonas and I are riding the most efficient race possible with the help of the team."
Read also
In the punchy finale though, Vingegaard once again looked impressive, matching Pogacar. Once again though, the Dane proved unable to come around and actually beat his long-time rival. Nevertheless, Jorgenson continues to be impressed by his team leader. "For sure. He had to sit down and wave the white flag — but even then, he still had that kick," he smiles.
"We were just thinking about pedalling as hard as we could. There aren’t many tactics on a 15% climb, so it was just about trying to do the best we could," concludes Jorgenson, who himself remains in GC contention after 7 stages, although he admits Pogacar again proved on another level in the fight for the stage. "In a sprint you always hope that you can beat him, but there wasn’t much else to do with the headwind and that really big, wide descent. It was pretty clear it was going to play out that way — and he has an untouchable sprint. So, chapeau. That’s his territory, for sure."
Read also

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 5visitors 4
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And yet, it attracts people, even you. What’s more, it attracts the rival fanboys to fill cyberspace with endless pointless my hero is better than your hero blabla that’s all been heard before and only helps sell the site as an advertising platform. You know what the solution is but most can’t resist. No different than women who follow and discuss celebs through gossip magazines.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment






