Tom Pidcock urged to "think about what Mathieu van der Poel did with Alpecin-Deceuninck" following Q36.5 move
Cycling
Tom Pidcock's time at the INEOS Grenadiers has ended and the multi-discipline British star has dropped down a level to sign for the ambitious Q36.5 Pro Cycling Team. Now, Pidcock has been urged to follow in the footsteps of Mathieu van der Poel at Alpecin-Deceuninck and lead Q36.5 into an era of success.
"Ivan Glasenberg is the owner of Q36.5 and he also bought Pinerolo for 200 million dollars. The value of Pidcock is that he gets good results on the road but even better results in cyclocross and mountain biking," assesses ex-pro Christian Vande Velde on the NBC Sports Cycling Podcast, Beyond the Podium.
Read also
Although Pidcock was given much freedom at the INEOS Grenadiers and allowed to combine his road ambitions with cyclocross and mountain bike, it's likely the double Olympic gold medallist will get unquestioned leadership of the Q36.5 Pro Cycling Team with almost complete autonomy to pick and choose the races best suited to his capabilities. If successful, could Pidcock lead Q36.5 into the World Tour, and into the biggest races on the calendar such as the Tour de France. Given his massive contract for a second tier team, it's potentially this that is the plan.
For this to happen, Vande Velde urges Pidcock to try and folloq in the footsteps of Mathieu van der Poel. "Pidcock is going to a team with a much smaller budget, but think about what Van der Poel did with Alpecin-Deceuninck," he explains. "When he first went to the Tour of Flanders, I didn't know a single other rider in that team. Now it's a great, incredible team. We need more important players, but in the Tour work I don't see it happening next year."
"Smaller teams that become bigger: it's happened before," adds Tejay van Garderen. "Sometimes you need that one rider and that lifts a team to a higher level. It's not that they're not used to riding big races. It's a reincarnation of Qhubeka. Those guys know what they're doing and have good riders. They just needed a certain focus. Tom Pidcock is going to give them that. It will be interesting to see what freedom he gets. I'm sure that being able to participate in cyclocross and mountain biking was part of the contract negotiations."
Read also
Things are about to get lit with @Q36_5ProCycling 🔥
— Tom Pidcock (@tompidcock) December 6, 2024
I'm excited to join the team for the next 3 years!
Read more - https://t.co/9BDzFUwUlI#RacingTheFuture
🎥 : Calvin Cheung pic.twitter.com/fuxtMGldFR

Kieran WoodDeputy Editor-in-Chief
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He regularly contributes to DartsNews.com and CyclingUpToDate.com, where he covers professional cycling and darts. In cycling, his work includes liveblogs from major races, including the Tour de France, the Giro d’Italia, and La Vuelta a España, alongside race reports and analysis. He has also conducted interviews with professional riders.
His reporting spans the full racing calendar, from one-day classics to stage races, with a focus on accurate, real-time coverage and clear contextual analysis. For statistics, results, and historical context, he regularly uses resources such as ProCyclingStats. To support reporting on rider activity and training context where relevant, he also references Strava.
In his work, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles as new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And we, what are we doing?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- And yet, it attracts people, even you. What’s more, it attracts the rival fanboys to fill cyberspace with endless pointless my hero is better than your hero blabla that’s all been heard before and only helps sell the site as an advertising platform. You know what the solution is but most can’t resist. No different than women who follow and discuss celebs through gossip magazines.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
8 Comments






