Nicolas Prodhomme denies Cian Uijtdebroeks comeback win in thrilling finale to stage 2 of 2025 Tour de l'Ain
Cycling
Decathlon AG2R La Mondiale Team's Nicolas Prodhomme has taken a very impressive win on stage 2 of the 2025 Tour de l'Ain, outkicking Cian Uijtdebroeks in a two-up fight for the line after a potentially decisive day in the mountains.
Heading into the final 50km of the day, four riders were out ahead of the peloton. Those being: Sergio Samitier (Cofidis), Thomas Champion (St Michel - Preference Home - Auber93), Gianluca Brambilla (Q36.5 Pro Cycling Team) and Jaakko Hänninen (Nice Métropole Côte d'Azur). Samitier and Brambilla proved the strongest of the break, and as they began the Cat 1 Col de Menthières with around 30km to go, the duo still had around 1:45 advantage over the peloton.
Both attackers were caught and passed by the top of the Col de Menthières though, with a new duo of Nicolas Prodhomme and Cian Uijtdebroeks entering the final 20km of the day clear by around a minute at the head of the race. Whilst the categorised climbing was over after that, in the final 10km, the gradient was steadily rising towards the finish line. Prodhomme and Uijtdebroeks were rolling together well though, and more than just holding off the chase, actually extending their advantage, 1:50 clear at 5km to go.
As the pair then started to play cat and mouse in the fight for the stage, that time gap did start to come down, but the stage win was never in doubt and in the end it was Prodhomme who started the sprint from the front and as Uijtdebroeks tied up behind, victory was the Decathlon rider's.
Read also
Results powered by FirstCycling.com
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- He should have been allowed to go to Movistar. Right now both arent a good fit for each other and are just wasting each other's time and effortabstractengineer08-11-2026
- Thibau Nys does exactly what Iserbyt is calling for
Rafionain-Glas08-11-2026 - i did not see it. was the relegation justified or an overly hard decision? and don‘t cross riders deviate from straight lines all the time? bumping into each others when they cut corners, etc … why being more strict with the rules on the finish sprint?Ketterechts08-11-2026
- seems like we are advertising the website with pointless comments…Ketterechts08-11-2026
- So?Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- The UCI do have their favorites.
Front24208-11-2026 - On a positive note, you maybe notice turning this topic into a discussion has the benefit of eliminating certain participants who do not see how they can turn it back to their sole interest ;-)Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- People see what they want to. I am actually the opposite of your accusation, probably more of a rebel than most of you who don’t get the big picture. The difference is, I don’t go moaning publicly about the consequences of my transgressions, I understand the need for rules and I take my OWN responsibility when deciding to ignore or break them or doing so involuntarily. I will also not hesitate to state my case or argue vehemently when relevant, sometimes it works, sometimes it makes things worse but that’s the price to pay for principles and having character.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- That may be but that was unknown to others and nothing says that’s the whole truth. Again, don’t try to misinterpret, it is a call and technically it is correct. Besides, even if there is a valid reason, that does not disqualify the ruling or punishment as far as the rules have been developed. I don’t think they’re as far as in football where for handball there is a distinction (in some ways and specific cases) between intentional or not. And football can be just as harsh and people live with it, eg the offside rule, also judged to within tiny fractions but often wrong or ignored. It’s the nature of every collective organisation and sometimes I wonder if our rebellion against it isn’t seated in the feelings we carry from the injustices we’ve felt personally, like being flashed driving 1km/h too fast when we are explained limits are just a security measure but we are absolutely certain not to have endangered anyone with our transgression. The problem is, nobody has better solutions and no 2 people have the same interpretation of where a limit should be.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
- Because for you deviated implies the other rider MUST have been made to fall and fail to finish ??? I don’t know if you ride a bike but next time someone carves you up or drives dangerously close, just hold back from those feelings of changing something, reporting or filming or even complaining. Everyone will just say, hey you’re still here undamaged, doesn’t seem like anyone did anything.Jumpyjohn08-11-2026
Loading
Write a comment







